Appraising patient preference methods for decision-making in the medical product lifecycle: an empirical comparison

被引:0
作者
Chiara Whichello
Bennett Levitan
Juhaeri Juhaeri
Vaishali Patadia
Rachael DiSantostefano
Cathy Anne Pinto
Esther W. de Bekker-Grob
机构
[1] Erasmus University Rotterdam,Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management and Erasmus Choice Modelling Centre
[2] Janssen R&D,undefined
[3] LLC,undefined
[4] Sanofi,undefined
[5] Merck & Co,undefined
[6] Inc,undefined
来源
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making | / 20卷
关键词
Patient preferences; Preference elicitation; Preference exploration; Preference assessment; Method comparison; Decision-making; Medical product lifecycle; Health preference research; Patient preference study;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 84 条
[1]  
Meredith Y(2016)Patient engagement at a tipping point—the need for cultural change across patient, sponsor, and regulator stakeholders: insights from the DIA conference Thrapeutic Innov Regul Sci 50 546-553
[2]  
Tarek A(2015)Incorporating patient-preference evidence into regulatory decision making Surg Endosc 29 2984-2993
[3]  
Marilyn M(2017)Giving patients’ preferences a voice in medical treatment life cycle: the PREFER public–private project Patient 10 263-266
[4]  
Bennett L(2019)Factors and situations influencing the value of patient preference studies along the medical product lifecycle: a literature review Drug Discov Today 24 57-68
[5]  
Rebecca N(2001)Eliciting public preferences for healthcare: a systematic review of techniques Health Technol Assess 5 1-186
[6]  
Anne M(2005)Exploring attitudes: the case for Q methodology Health Educ Res 20 206-213
[7]  
Ho M(2007)Care for a break? An investigation of informal caregivers’ attitudes toward respite care using Q-methodology Health Policy 83 332-342
[8]  
Gonzalez J(2014)Qmethod: a package to explore human perspectives using Q methodology R J 6 163-173
[9]  
Lerner H(2006)Analytic hierarchy process: an overview of applications Eur J Oper Res 169 1-29
[10]  
Newuland C(2013)Comparing continuous sedation until death and euthanasia: professional caregivers’ attitudes and experiences. A focus group study in flanders, Belgium Palliat Med 27 553-561