Self-regulated learning strategies and non-academic outcomes in higher education blended learning environments: A one decade review

被引:0
作者
Lilian Anthonysamy
Ah-Choo Koo
Soon-Hin Hew
机构
[1] Multimedia University,Faculty of Management
[2] Multimedia University,Faculty of Creative Multimedia
来源
Education and Information Technologies | 2020年 / 25卷
关键词
Self-regulated learning strategies; Self-regulated learning; Learning strategies; Blended learning; University; Higher education; Learning performance; Non-academic outcome;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Although university students use their digital devices for almost everything, current studies shows that students have difficulties with digital learning because they lack in self-regulated skills which in return lead to low performance. Self-regulated learning strategies (SRLS) are used assist students to learn efficiently. While many researchers have investigated SRLS towards academic outcomes such as grades, little is known about the use of SRLS towards non-academic outcomes that are also essential to assist university students’ learning progression. Hence, there is a need to understand how best to utilise SRLS to drive positive non-academic outcomes in digital learning within a blended learning environment. The systematic review methodology follows PRISMA guidelines to explore the current literature. Different sources were searched using predefined search items. A total of 239 retrievals were found which were screened for duplication. A closer screening was done on the abstracts and titles of 239 papers after duplication removal. 28 full text papers were evaluated for eligibility. Finally, 14 papers were then selected for the review. Most of the papers included in the review were peer-reviewed articles published in social science and educational journals. List of self-regulated learning strategies and non-academic outcomes used in a blended learning environment in higher education institutions were identified. Majority of the 14 reviewed papers investigated metacognitive knowledge, resource management and motivational belief strategies towards learning performance whereas cognitive engagement strategies was the least researched. Results revealed that generally, SRLS positively correlate with non-academic outcomes. At the end of the review, research gap and the future direction are presented.
引用
收藏
页码:3677 / 3704
页数:27
相关论文
共 125 条
[1]  
Barnard L(2009)Measuring self-regulation in online and blended learning environments Internet and Higher Education 12 1-6
[2]  
Lan WY(2014)A meta-analysis of blended learning and technology use in higher education: From the general to the applied Journal of Computing in Higher Education 26 87-122
[3]  
To YM(2015)Self-regulated learning strategies & academic achievement in online higher education learning environments: A systematic review Internet and Higher Education 27 1-13
[4]  
Paton VO(2012)Influence of participation, facilitator styles, and metacognitive reflection on knowledge building in online university courses Computers and Education 58 874-884
[5]  
Lai SL(2005)Applying self-regulated learning strategies in a web-based instruction - an investigation of motivation perception Computer Assisted Language Learning 18 217-230
[6]  
Bernard RM(2013)What drives a successful web-based language learning environment? An empirical investigation of the critical factors influencing college students’ learning satisfaction Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 103 1327-1336
[7]  
Borokhovski E(2019)Using game-based negotiation mechanism to enhance students’ goal setting and regulation Computers and Education 129 71-81
[8]  
Schmid RF(2018)Online learning in higher education: Exploring advantages and disadvantages for engagement Journal of Computing in Higher Education 30 452-465
[9]  
Tamim RM(2013)Self-regulated learning: Key strategies and their sources in a sample of adolescent males Australian Journal of Educational & Develop- mental Psychology 13 58-74
[10]  
Abrami PC(2011)Student-content interactions in online courses: The role of question prompts in facilitating higher-level engagement with course content Journal of Computing in Higher Education 23 157-186