Diagnosis and differential diagnosis of granulosa cell tumor

被引:0
作者
Schmidt D. [1 ,2 ]
Kommoss F. [1 ]
机构
[1] Institut für Pathologie, Mannheim
[2] Institut für Pathologie, 68159 Mannheim, A2
来源
Der Pathologe | 2007年 / 28卷 / 3期
关键词
Call-Exner bodies; Granulosa cell tumor; adult type; juvenile type; Immunohistochemistry;
D O I
10.1007/s00292-007-0908-8
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Clinically and morphologically, two types of granulosa cell tumor can be distinguished, the more frequent adult type and the juvenile type. In the adult type, different growth patterns can be observed: microfollicular (most frequent, characterized by Call-Exner bodies), macrofollicular, trabecular, insular, solid-tubular, gyriform and diffuse (sarcomatoid). The juvenile type is characterized by solid and follicular structures. The neoplastic granulosa cells in the adult type have limited cytoplasm and haphazardly arranged angular, pale, mostly grooved nuclei. In the juvenile type, the cells have ample eosinophilic cytoplasm and polymorphic, sometimes bizarre nuclei, which are usually non-grooved. The number of mitoses in the adult type usually does not exceed 2/10 HPF, whereas it is considerably higher in the juvenile type, including atypical mitoses. A common feature in both types of tumor is the expression of inhibin-α, calretinin and CD 99. Epithelial membrane antigen is negative. Molecular genetics has demonstrated loss of heterozygosity at 19p13.3 in 52% of the cases. Besides chromosomal aberrations, there are a large number of cytogenetic anomalies. The most important prognostic factor in both types of tumor is tumor stage. Whereas recurrences in the adult type can develop even after decades, in the juvenile type they usually occur during the first 3 years after diagnosis. © 2007 Springer Medizin Verlag.
引用
收藏
页码:195 / 202
页数:7
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]  
Aguirre P., Thor A.D., Scully R.E., Ovarian endometrioid carcinomas resembling sex cord-stromal tumors. An immunohistochemical study, Int J Gynecol Pathol, 8, (1989)
[2]  
Bjorkholm E.S.C., Prognostic factors in granulosa cell tumor, Gynecol Oncol, 11, (1981)
[3]  
Chan J.K., Zhang M., Kaleb V., Et al., Prognostic factors responsible for survival in sex cord stromal tumors of the ovary-a multivariate analysis, Gynecol Oncol, 96, (2005)
[4]  
Costa M.J., DeRose P.B., Roth L.M., Et al., Immunohistochemical phenotype of ovarian granulosa cell tumors: absence of epithelial membrane antigen has diagnostic value, Hum Pathol, 25, (1994)
[5]  
Fox H.A.K., Langley F.A., A clinicopathological study of 92 cases o9f granulosa cell tumor of the ovary with special reference to the factors influencing prognosis, Cancer, 35, (1975)
[6]  
Fujimoto T., Sakuragi N., Okuyama K., Et al., Histopathological prognostic factors of adult granulosa cell tumors of the ovary, Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, 80, (2001)
[7]  
Gittleman A.M., Price A.P., Coren C., Et al., Juvenile granulosa cell tumor, Clin Imaging, 27, (2003)
[8]  
Kato N., Romero M., Catasus L., Prat J., The STK11/LKB1 Peutz-Jegher gene is not involved in the pathogenesis of sporadic sex cord-stromal tumors, although loss of heterozygosity at 19p13.3 indicates other gene alteration in these tumors, Hum Pathol, 35, (2004)
[9]  
Kommoss F., Oliva E., Young R.H., Et al., Expression of Müllerian Inhibiting substance, CD99 and HEA125 in ovarian tumors, Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd, 61, (2001)
[10]  
Lin Y.S., Eng H.L., Jan Y.J., Et al., Molecular cytogenetics of ovarian granulosa cell tumors by comparative genomic hybridization, Gynecol Oncol, 97, (2005)