Diode laser (980 nm) enucleation of the prostate: a promising alternative to transurethral resection of the prostate

被引:0
作者
Stephen S. Yang
Cheng-Hsing Hsieh
Yi-Shin Lee
Shang-Jen Chang
机构
[1] Buddhist Tzu Chi General Hospital,Division of Urology, Department of Surgery
[2] Buddhist Tzu Chi General Hospital,Department of Pathology
[3] Taipei Branch,Department of Urology, School of Medicine
[4] Buddhist Tzu Chi University,undefined
来源
Lasers in Medical Science | 2013年 / 28卷
关键词
Benign prostatic obstruction; Prostate; Laser; Diode laser; Transurethral resection of prostate;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
With good hemostatic ability, the end-firing continuous-wave diode laser at 980 nm was used to enucleate the prostate (DiLEP) for the treatment of benign prostatic obstruction (BPO). The study compared the patients’ demographics and surgical outcomes between DiLEP and transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP). Patients with significant BPO and a total prostatic weight of 40 g or more who had undergone DiLEP (n = 74) or TURP (n = 52) during the same period at our hospital were enrolled for analysis. DiLEP was performed by a single surgeon (Yang), and TURP by three surgeons (Yang, Hsieh and Chang). The 4-U incision technique was developed for DiLEP. The diode laser ensured bloodless incision followed by blunt dissection using the resectoscope and laser fiber as an 'index finger' to enucleate the prostate. To prevent unexpected deep thermal damage, the power of the laser was set at 80 W and the laser beam was directed towards the bladder neck and not towards the prostatic capsule. Demographic data and perioperative parameters were comparable between the two groups, except that DiLEP resulted in a significantly lower drop in hemoglobin level (0.9 ± 1.0 vs. 1.6 ± 2.4 g/dl, p = 0.03), shorter catheterization time (41.2 ± 19.9 vs. 67.7 ± 33.3 h, p = 0.01), and shorter postoperative stay (2.9 ± 1.9 vs. 4.1 ± 6.2 days, p = 00.01). Delayed postoperative sloughing of necrotic tissue was not observed in the DiLEP group. Improvements in voiding parameters were comparable between the groups, and were sustained during a follow-up of up to 1 year. DiLEP provided better hemostasis than TURP as evidenced by less blood loss. The role of DiLEP treating BPO requires further investigation.
引用
收藏
页码:353 / 360
页数:7
相关论文
共 106 条
[1]  
Berry SJ(1984)The development of human benign prostatic hyperplasia with age J Urol 132 474-479
[2]  
Coffey DS(2004)EAU 2004 guidelines on assessment, therapy and follow-up of men with lower urinary tract symptoms suggestive of benign prostatic obstruction (BPH guidelines) Eur Urol 46 547-554
[3]  
Walsh PC(2003)AUA guideline on management of benign prostatic hyperplasia (2003). Chapter 1: Diagnosis and treatment recommendations J Urol 170 530-547
[4]  
Ewing LL(2008)Morbidity, mortality and early outcome of transurethral resection of the prostate: a prospective multicenter evaluation of 10,654 patients J Urol 180 246-249
[5]  
Madersbacher S(2011)New advances in benign prostatic hyperplasia: laser therapy Curr Urol Rep 12 56-61
[6]  
Alivizatos G(2007)The diode laser: a novel side-firing approach for laser vaporisation of the human prostate – immediate efficacy and 1-year follow-up Eur Urol 52 1717-1722
[7]  
Nordling J(2009)High power diode laser vaporization of the prostate: preliminary results for benign prostatic hyperplasia J Urol 182 1078-1082
[8]  
Sanz CR(2009)High-power diode laser at 980 nm for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia: ex vivo investigations on porcine kidneys and human cadaver prostates Lasers Med Sci 24 172-178
[9]  
Emberton M(2009)Prospective single-centre comparison of 120-W diode-pumped solid-state high-intensity system laser vaporization of the prostate and 200-W high-intensive diode-laser ablation of the prostate for treating benign prostatic hyperplasia BJU Int 104 820-825
[10]  
de la Rosette JJ(2010)Preliminary results of prostate vaporization in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia by using a 200-W high-intensity diode laser Urology 75 658-663