Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty combined with presbyopia‐correcting and toric intraocular lenses – a narrative review

被引:0
作者
Marina Rodríguez-Calvo-de-Mora
Carlos Rocha-de-Lossada
Vito Romano
Manuel Rodríguez-Vallejo
Joaquín Fernández
机构
[1] Department of Ophthalmology of VITHAS Almería Hospital,Qvision
[2] VITHAS Málaga,Ophthalmology Department
[3] Hospital Regional Universitario de Málaga,Departamento de Cirugía, Área de Oftalmología
[4] Universidad de Sevilla,Ophthalmic Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences, and Public Health
[5] University of Brescia,Ophthalmic Unit
[6] ASST Spedali Civili di Brescia,undefined
来源
BMC Ophthalmology | / 23卷
关键词
Endothelial keratoplasty; Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty; Multifocal intraocular lenses; Extended-depth of focus intraocular lenses; Toric intraocular lenses; Presbyopia‐correcting intraocular lenses;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy (FECD) is the leading indication for EK and may coexist with cataract and presbyopia. Notably, the outcomes of phacoemulsification in FECD patients are not as favorable as those in eyes without this condition. Historically, only monofocal intraocular lenses (IOLs) were recommended for these patients. However, recent reports have described the implantation of Premium-IOLs (such as Multifocal IOLs, Enhanced Depth of Focus IOLs, and Toric IOLs) in FECD eyes undergoing cataract surgery and Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK). While the results are encouraging, they are not as optimal as those from unoperated eyes, especially when comparing simultaneous procedures to sequential ones. It’s advised to perform the DMEK first to improve the accuracy of IOL calculations. Still, even successfully operated eyes may experience secondary graft failure or graft rejection after DMEK. The success rate of a secondary DMEK is typically lower than that of the initial procedure. Furthermore, if the postoperative thickness after DMEK is less than anticipated, laser enhancements might not be an option. There’s a pressing need for more controlled and randomized clinical trials to ascertain the safety and effectiveness of Premium-IOLs for FECD eyes. This narrative review aims to collate evidence on the use of Premium IOL technologies in eyes receiving EK and to underscore key points for surgeons performing EK combined with cataract surgery.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 483 条
[1]  
Dapena I(2009)Endothelial keratoplasty: DSEK/DSAEK or DMEK - the thinner the better? Curr Opin Ophthalmol 20 299-307
[2]  
Ham L(2018)Descemet’s membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) versus Descemet’s stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) for corneal endothelial failure Cochrane Database Syst Rev 6 CD012097-252
[3]  
Melles GRJ(2012)Endothelial keratoplasty: a revolution in evolution Surv Ophthalmol 57 236-32
[4]  
Stuart AJ(2013)Evolution of endothelial keratoplasty Cornea 32 S28-889
[5]  
Romano V(2006)Descemet-stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty Cornea 25 886-990
[6]  
Virgili G(2006)Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) Cornea 25 987-297
[7]  
Shortt AJ(2020)Five-year graft survival and clinical outcomes of 500 consecutive cases after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty Cornea 39 290-1555
[8]  
Anshu A(2016)Two-year refractive outcomes after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty Cornea 35 1549-173
[9]  
Price MO(2019)Immune reactions after modern lamellar (DALK, DSAEK, DMEK) versus conventional penetrating corneal transplantation Prog Retin Eye Res 73 100768-7
[10]  
Tan DTH(2016)Global survey of corneal transplantation and eye banking JAMA Ophthalmol 134 167-392