Mechanical Circulatory Support for Decompensated Heart Failure

被引:8
作者
Musa T.A. [1 ]
Chue C.D. [1 ]
Lim H.S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Edgbaston, Birmingham
关键词
Cardiogenic shock; Heart failure; Ventricular assist device;
D O I
10.1007/s11897-017-0349-5
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose of Review: Cardiogenic shock from decompensated heart failure is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Mechanical circulatory support (MCS) improves haemodynamics and reverses organ dysfunction in critically ill patients with cardiogenic shock. This paper summarises the main modalities of mechanical support and their physiological impact, practical considerations, advantages and disadvantages to facilitate a holistic approach in managing a potentially lethal pathology. Recent Findings: To date, there remains a lack of large randomised controlled trials to support the use of any mechanical support strategy. Consequently, meta-analyses, registry data and expert consensus in the form of society guidelines are relied upon. Currently, randomised trials are in progress to assess the efficacy of a percutaneous assist device (Impella) and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Summary: Mechanical support options are centred around the use of counter pulsation and percutaneous assist devices and the use of an extracorporeal pump and are hence varied in means of application, degree of haemodynamic benefit and potential complications. Regardless of future innovations, a timely multidisciplinary approach that incorporates both patient and institutional considerations will always be crucial to a successful outcome. © 2017, Springer Science+Business Media, LLC.
引用
收藏
页码:365 / 375
页数:10
相关论文
共 67 条
[1]  
Hollenberg S.M., Kavinsky C.J., Parrillo J.E., Cardiogenic shock, Ann Intern Med, 131, 1, pp. 47-59, (1999)
[2]  
Reynolds H.R., Hochman J.S., Cardiogenic shock: current concepts and improving outcomes, Circulation, 117, 5, pp. 686-697, (2008)
[3]  
Lim H.S., Cardiogenic shock: failure of oxygen delivery and oxygen utilization, Clin Cardiol, 39, 8, pp. 477-483, (2016)
[4]  
Stretch R., Sauer C.M., Yuh D.D., Bonde P., National trends in the utilization of short-term mechanical circulatory support: incidence, outcomes, and cost analysis, J Am Coll Cardiol, 64, 14, pp. 1407-1415, (2014)
[5]  
Werdan K., Gielen S., Ebelt H., Hochman J.S., Mechanical circulatory support in cardiogenic shock, Eur Heart J, 35, 3, pp. 156-167, (2014)
[6]  
Kantrowitz A., Tjonneland S., Freed P.S., Phillips S.J., Butner A.N., Sherman J.L., Initial clinical experience with intraaortic balloon pumping in cardiogenic shock, JAMA, 203, 2, pp. 113-118, (1968)
[7]  
Subramanian V.A., Goldstein J.E., Sos T.A., McCabe J.C., Hoover E.A., Gay W.A., Preliminary clinical experience with percutaneous intraaortic balloon pumping, Circulation, 62, 2, pp. I123-I129, (1980)
[8]  
Kapur N.K., Esposito M., Hemodynamic support with percutaneous devices in patients with heart failure, Heart Fail Clin, 11, 2, pp. 215-230, (2015)
[9]  
Estep J.D., Cordero-Reyes A.M., Bhimaraj A., Trachtenberg B., Khalil N., Loebe M., Et al., Percutaneous placement of an intra-aortic balloon pump in the left axillary/subclavian position provides safe, ambulatory long-term support as bridge to heart transplantation, JACC Heart Fail, 1, 5, pp. 382-388, (2013)
[10]  
Rihal C.S., Naidu S.S., Givertz M.M., Szeto W.Y., Burke J.A., Kapur N.K., Et al., 2015 SCAI/ACC/HFSA/STS Clinical Expert Consensus Statement on the Use of Percutaneous Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices in Cardiovascular Care: endorsed by the American Heart Association, the Cardiological Society of India, and Sociedad Latino Americana de Cardiologia Intervencion