Panoramic ultrasonography is a valid method to measure changes in skeletal muscle cross-sectional area

被引:0
作者
Juha P. Ahtiainen
Merja Hoffren
Juha J. Hulmi
Mikko Pietikäinen
Antti A. Mero
Janne Avela
Keijo Häkkinen
机构
[1] University of Jyväskylä,Department of Biology of Physical Activity and Neuromuscular Research Center
来源
European Journal of Applied Physiology | 2010年 / 108卷
关键词
MRI; Resistance training; Muscle hypertrophy; Vastus lateralis;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The purpose of this study was to examine the reliability and validity of the “panoramic” brightness mode ultrasonography (US) method to detect training-induced changes in muscle cross-sectional area (CSA) by comparison with results obtained using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Out of 27 young male volunteers, 20 subjects were assigned to training group and seven to non-training control group. Muscle CSAs of vastus lateralis were analyzed by MRI and US before and after 21 weeks of either heavy resistance training or control period. Measured by both the US and MRI, the resistance training induced significant increases (~13–14%, P < 0.001) in muscle CSA, whereas no changes were observed in control group. A high repeatability was found between the two consequent US measurements (intraclass correlation coefficient, ICC of 0.997) with standard error of measurement (SEM) of 0.38 cm2 and smallest detectable difference of 1.1 cm2. Validity of the US method against MRI in assessing CSA of VL produced ICC of 0.905 and SEM of 0.87 cm2 with high limits of agreement analyzed by Bland and Altman method. However, the MRI produced systematically (10 ± 4%, P < 0.01) larger CSA values than the US method. The US showed high agreement against MRI in detecting changes in muscle CSA (ICC of 0.929, SEM of 0.94 cm2). The results of this study showed that the panoramic US method provides repeatable measures of a muscle CSA although MRI produced larger absolute CSA values. Moreover, this US method detects training-induced changes in muscle CSA with a comparable degree of precision to MRI.
引用
收藏
页码:273 / 279
页数:6
相关论文
共 62 条
[1]  
Bemben MG(2002)Use of diagnostic ultrasound for assessing muscle size J Strength Cond Res 16 103-108
[2]  
Beneke R(1991)Muscle cross-section measurement by magnetic resonance imaging Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol 63 424-429
[3]  
Neuerburg J(1993)Changes in lower limb muscle cross-sectional area and tissue fluid volume after transition from standing to supine Acta Physiol Scand 148 379-385
[4]  
Bohndorf K(1986)Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement Lancet 1 307-310
[5]  
Berg HE(1979)The effect of weight-lifting exercise related to muscle fiber composition and muscle cross-sectional area in humans Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol 40 95-106
[6]  
Tedner B(1991)Morphometry of the human thigh muscles. A comparison between anatomical sections and computer tomographic and magnetic resonance images J Anat 176 139-156
[7]  
Tesch PA(2002)Measurement of human muscle volume using ultrasonography Eur J Appl Physiol 87 90-92
[8]  
Bland JM(2001)Selective muscle hypertrophy, changes in EMG and force, and serum hormones during strength training in older women J Appl Physiol 91 569-580
[9]  
Altman DG(1996)The reliability of measuring quadriceps cross-sectional area with compound B ultrasound scanning Physiother Res Int 1 112-126
[10]  
Dons B(2009)Acute and long-term effects of resistance exercise with or without protein ingestion on muscle hypertrophy and gene expression Amino Acids 37 297-308