Numerical computation of motions and structural loads for large containership using 3D Rankine panel method

被引:9
|
作者
Kim J.-H. [1 ]
Kim Y. [1 ]
机构
[1] Department of Naval Architecture & Ocean Engineering, Seoul National University, Seoul
关键词
benchmark test; containership; fluid-structure interaction; Rankine panel method; springing; whipping;
D O I
10.1007/s11804-017-1435-5
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In this paper, we present the results of our numerical seakeeping analyses of a 6750-TEU containership, which were subjected to the benchmark test of the 2nd ITTC–ISSC Joint Workshop held in 2014. We performed the seakeeping analyses using three different methods based on a 3D Rankine panel method, including 1) a rigid-body solver, 2) a flexible-body solver using a beam model, and 3) a flexible-body solver using the eigenvectors of a 3D Finite Element Model (FEM). The flexible-body solvers adopt a fully coupled approach between the fluid and structure. We consider the nonlinear Froude–Krylov and restoring forces using a weakly nonlinear approach. In addition, we calculate the slamming loads on the bow flare and stern using a 2D generalized Wagner model. We compare the numerical and experimental results in terms of the linear response, the time series of the nonlinear response, and the longitudinal distribution of the sagging and hogging moments. The flexible-body solvers show good agreement with the experimental model with respect to both the linear and nonlinear results, including the high-frequency oscillations due to springing and whipping vibrations. The rigid-body solver gives similar results except for the springing and whipping. © 2017, Harbin Engineering University and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany.
引用
收藏
页码:417 / 426
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Numerical Studies of Coupling Effect of Sloshing on 3D Ship Motions
    Saripilli, Jai Ram
    Sen, Debabrata
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OFFSHORE AND POLAR ENGINEERING, 2017, 27 (01) : 27 - 35
  • [32] Numerical modelling of 3D reconnection due to rotational footpoint motions
    De Moortel, I
    Galsgaard, K
    ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS, 2006, 451 (03) : 1101 - 1115
  • [33] 3D Computation of Electric Field by a Stochastic Method
    Leveque, Jean
    Hinaje, Melika
    Berger, Kevin
    Panfilov, Mikhail
    PROGRESS IN ELECTROMAGNETICS RESEARCH M, 2018, 67 : 119 - 128
  • [34] Dynamics of 3D sliding beams undergoing large overall motions
    Deng, Lanfeng
    Zhang, Yahui
    Kennedy, David
    COMMUNICATIONS IN NONLINEAR SCIENCE AND NUMERICAL SIMULATION, 2021, 98
  • [35] Numerical flow computation around aeroelastic 3D square cylinder using inflow turbulence
    Kataoka, H
    Mizuno, M
    WIND AND STRUCTURES, 2002, 5 (2-4) : 379 - 392
  • [36] Large electromagnetic scattering computation using iterative progressive numerical method
    Ye, QB
    Shafai, L
    IEEE ANTENNAS AND PROPAGATION SOCIETY INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM - 1996 DIGEST, VOLS 1-3, 1996, : 938 - 941
  • [37] DEVELOPMENT OF 3D NUMERICAL MANIFOLD METHOD
    He, Lei
    Ma, Guowei
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL METHODS, 2010, 7 (01) : 107 - 129
  • [38] Computation of electric and magnetic stimulation in human head using the 3D impedance method
    Nadeem, M
    Thorlin, T
    Gandhi, OP
    Persson, M
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 2003, 50 (07) : 900 - 907
  • [39] 3D traveltime computation using fast marching upwind bilinear interpolation method
    Sun Zhang-Qing
    Sun Jian-Guo
    Yue Yu-Bo
    Jiang Zhao-Nan
    CHINESE JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICS-CHINESE EDITION, 2015, 58 (06): : 2011 - 2023
  • [40] Computation of delay spread using 3D measurements
    Nielsen, JO
    Pedersen, GF
    Olesen, K
    Kovács, IZ
    1999 IEEE 49TH VEHICULAR TECHNOLOGY CONFERENCE, VOLS 1-3: MOVING INTO A NEW MILLENIUM, 1999, : 792 - 796