Nurturing breakthroughs: lessons from complexity theory

被引:0
作者
D. Sornette
机构
[1] Technology and Economics,Department of Management
[2] ETH Zurich,undefined
来源
Journal of Economic Interaction and Coordination | 2008年 / 3卷
关键词
Complexity Theory; Exogenous Shock; Human Affair; Social Unrest; Commercial Sale;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
A general theory of innovation and progress in human society is outlined, based on the combat between two opposite forces (conservatism/inertia and speculative herding “bubble” behavior). We contend that human affairs are characterized by ubiquitous “bubbles”, which involve huge risks which would not otherwise be taken using standard cost/benefit analysis. Bubbles result from self-reinforcing positive feedbacks. This leads to explore uncharted territories and niches whose rare successes lead to extraordinary discoveries and provide the base for the observed accelerating development of technology and of the economy. But the returns are very heterogeneous and very risky. In other words, bubbles, which are characteristic definitions of human activity, allow huge risks to get huge returns over large scales. We refer to and summarize a large bibliography covering our research efforts in the last decade, which present the relevant underlying mathematical tools and a few results involving positive feedbacks, emergence, heavy-tailed power laws, outliers/kings, the problem of predictability and the illusion of control.
引用
收藏
页码:165 / 181
页数:16
相关论文
共 93 条
[1]  
Aldhous P(2006)Dolly’s cloning revolution fails to materialise New Sci 2558 8-585
[2]  
Coghlan A(2004)Fearless versus fearful speculative financial bubbles Physica A 337 565-638
[3]  
Andersen JV(1995)Universal log-periodic correction to renormalization group scaling for rupture stress prediction from acoustic emissions J Phys I France 5 631-45
[4]  
Sornette D(1999)Prédiction de la rupture de réservoirs composites de haute pression à l’aide de l’émission acoustique Contrôle Industriel 220 43-6696
[5]  
Anifrani J-C(1995)Complexity, contingency, and criticality Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 92 6689-19
[6]  
Le Floc’h C(1996)Measuring science revolutions Nature 384 325-190
[7]  
Sornette D(2006)Biomedical research: facing the opposition Nature 441 17-791
[8]  
Souillard B(2007)Cloning special: Dolly: a hart act to follow Nature 445 802-821
[9]  
Anifrani J-C(2008)Quantitative determination of the level of cooperation in the presence of punishment in three public good experiments J. Econ Interac Coord 72 016112-406
[10]  
Le Floc’h C(2005)The dynamics of book sales: endogenous versus exogenous shocks in complex networks Phys Rev E 6 247-106