Comparison of earthquake source characteristics in the Kachchh Rift Basin and Saurashtra horst, Deccan Volcanic Province, western India

被引:0
作者
B Sairam
A P Singh
M Ravi Kumar
机构
[1] Institute of Seismological Research,
[2] CSIR-National Geophysical Research Institute,undefined
来源
Journal of Earth System Science | 2018年 / 127卷
关键词
Stress drop; seismic moment; focal mechanisms; seismotectonics;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Seismic source parameters of small to moderate sized intraplate earthquakes that occurred during 2002–2009 in the tectonic blocks of Kachchh Rift Basin (KRB) and the Saurashtra Horst (SH), in the stable continental region of western peninsular India, are studied through spectral analysis of shear waves. The data of aftershock sequence of the 2001 Bhuj earthquake (Mw\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$M_{w}$$\end{document} 7.7) in the KRB and the 2007 Talala earthquake (Mw\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$M_{w}$$\end{document} 5.0) in the SH are used for this study. In the SH, the seismic moment (Mo)\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$M_{o})$$\end{document}, corner frequency (fc)\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$(f_{c})$$\end{document}, stress drop (Δσ\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\varDelta \sigma $$\end{document}) and source radius (r) vary from 7.8×1011\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$7.8\times 10^{11}$$\end{document} to 4.0×\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$4.0\times $$\end{document}1016\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$^{16}$$\end{document} N-m, 1.0–8.9 Hz, 4.8–10.2 MPa and 195–1480 m, respectively. While in the KRB, these parameters vary from Mo∼1.24×1011\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$M_{o} \sim 1.24 \,\times \, 10^{11}$$\end{document} to 4.1×1016\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$4.1 \times 10^{16}$$\end{document} N-m, fc∼\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$f_{c }\sim $$\end{document} 1.6 to 13.1 Hz, Δσ∼0.06\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\varDelta \sigma \sim 0.06$$\end{document} to 16.62 MPa and r∼100\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$r \sim 100$$\end{document} to 840 m. The kappa (K) value in the KRB (0.025–0.03) is slightly larger than that in the SH region (0.02), probably due to thick sedimentary layers. The estimated stress drops of earthquakes in the KRB are relatively higher than those in SH, due to large crustal stress concentration associated with mafic/ultramafic rocks at the hypocentral depths. The results also suggest that the stress drop value of intraplate earthquakes is larger than the interplate earthquakes. In addition, it is observed that the strike-slip events in the SH have lower stress drops, compared to the thrust and strike-slip events.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 259 条
[1]  
Abercrombie R(1993)Source parameters of small earthquakes recorded at 2.5 km depth, Cajon Pass, southern California: Implications for earthquake scaling Geophys. Res. Lett. 20 1511-1514
[2]  
Leary P(1967)Scaling law of seismic spectrum J. Geophys. Res. 72 1217-1231
[3]  
Aki K(2013)Scaling earthquake ground motions in western Anatolia, Turkey Phys. Chem. Earth., Parts A/B/C 63 124-135
[4]  
Akinci A(2003)Rupture process of the 26 January 2001 Mw 7.6 Bhuj, India, Earthquake from teleseismic broadband data Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 93 1235-1248
[5]  
D’Amico S(1982)Source parameters of the 1980 Mammoth Lakes, California, earthquake sequence J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 87 4595-4607
[6]  
Malagnini L(1994)Study of foreshocks and aftershocks of the intraplate earthquake of September 30, 1993, India Latur Earthq. Geol. Soc. India Mem. 35 33-66
[7]  
Mercuri A(1987)Regional tectonic framework, structure and evolution of the western marginal basins of India Tectonophys. 135 307-327
[8]  
Antolik M(2005)A review of structure and tectonics of Kutch basin, western India, with special reference to earthquakes Curr. Sci. 88 1592-1600
[9]  
Dreger DS(2004)Source parameters and tectonic implications of aftershocks of the Mw 7.6 Bhuj Earthquake of 26 January 2001 Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 94 818-827
[10]  
Archuleta RJ(1959)On estimation of the displacement in an earthquake source and of source dimensions Ann. Geophys. 12 205-214