Marine Protected Dramas: The Flaws of the Brazilian National System of Marine Protected Areas

被引:0
作者
Leopoldo C. Gerhardinger
Eduardo A. S. Godoy
Peter J. S. Jones
Gilberto Sales
Beatrice P. Ferreira
机构
[1] Associação de Estudos Costeiros e Marinhos—ECOMAR NGO,CTTMar, Laboratório de Educação Ambiental
[2] Universidade do Vale do Itajaí,Department of Geography
[3] Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade,Centro de Tecnologia, Departamento de Oceanografia
[4] SCEN,undefined
[5] University College London (UCL),undefined
[6] Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade,undefined
[7] Centro Tamar,undefined
[8] Universidade Federal de Pernambuco,undefined
来源
Environmental Management | 2011年 / 47卷
关键词
Coastal management; Marine conservation; Marine reserves; Convention on biological diversity; Marine spatial management; Ocean governance;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This article discusses the current problems and issues associated with the implementation of a National System of Marine Protected Areas in Brazil. MPA managers and higher governmental level authorities were interviewed about their perceptions of the implementation of a national MPA strategy and the recent changes in the institutional arrangement of government marine conservation agencies. Interviewees’ narratives were generally pessimistic and the National System was perceived as weak, with few recognizable marine conservation outcomes on the ground. The following major flaws were identified: poor inter-institutional coordination of coastal and ocean governance; institutional crisis faced by the national government marine conservation agency; poor management within individual MPAs; problems with regional networks of marine protected areas; an overly bureaucratic management and administrative system; financial shortages creating structural problems and a disconnect between MPA policy and its delivery. Furthermore, a lack of professional motivation and a pessimistic atmosphere was encountered during many interviews, a malaise which we believe affects how the entire system is able to respond to crises. Our findings highlight the need for a better understanding of the role of ‘leadership’ in the performance of socio-ecological systems (such as MPA networks), more effective official evaluation mechanisms, more localized audits of (and reforms if necessary to) Brazil’s federal biodiversity conservation agency (ICMBio), and the need for political measures to promote state leadership and support. Continuing to focus on the designation of more MPAs whilst not fully addressing these issues will achieve little beyond fulfilling, on paper, Brazil’s international marine biodiversity commitments.
引用
收藏
页码:630 / 643
页数:13
相关论文
共 53 条
  • [1] Abdallah PR(2007)An historical account of Brazilian public policy on fisheries subsidies Marine Policy 31 444-450
  • [2] Sumaila UR(2006)Resolving mismatches in U.S. ocean governance Science 313 617-618
  • [3] Crowder LB(2002)O processo de integração da gestão das unidades de conservação marinho costeiras de santa catarina–Brasil Gerenciamento Costeiro Integrado 2 10-11
  • [4] Osherenko G(2008)Environmental concerns in contemporary Brazil: an insight into some theoretical and societal backgrounds (1970–1990s) International Journal of Politics, Culture and Society 19 161-177
  • [5] Young OR(2006)Effects of fishing and protection on Brazilian reef fishes Biological Conservation 128 391-402
  • [6] Airamé S(2009)Local ecological knowledge and the management of marine protected areas in Brazil Ocean & Coastal Management 52 154-165
  • [7] Norse EA(2008)The income requirements of marine protected areas Ocean & Coastal Management 51 272-283
  • [8] Baron N(2009)Fisheries and coastal governance as a wicked problem Marine Policy 33 553-560
  • [9] Day JC(2001)Marine protected area strategies: issues, divergences and the search for middle ground Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries 11 197-216
  • [10] Douvere F(2006)Collective action problems posed by no take zones Marine Policy 30 143-156