Evaluating the environmental and economic performance of biological and advanced biological wastewater treatment plants by life cycle assessment and life cycle costing

被引:0
作者
Simge Çankaya
Beyhan Pekey
机构
[1] Kocaeli University,Department of Environmental Engineering
来源
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment | 2024年 / 196卷
关键词
Environmental impact; Life cycle assessment; Life cycle costing; Net environmental benefit; Sustainability; Wastewater treatment;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The primary objective of this study is to assess and establish benchmarks for environmental and economic sustainability of biological and advanced biological wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) with different treatment technologies and characteristics. Furthermore, the study aims to determine the beneficial role of WWTPs to reduction of eutrophication potential. Environmental and economic sustainability of ten municipal WWTPs was assessed using life cycle assessment (LCA) and life cycle costing (LCC). In the first section of the study, LCA was performed to determine the environmental performance of the WWTPs. Furthermore, net environmental benefit (NEB) approach was implemented to reveal the beneficial role of WWTPs to eutrophication potential. In the subsequent section, LCA-based LCC was conducted by integrating the results of LCA. The most significant environmental impact was determined as marine aquatic ecotoxicity, which is highly affected from the generation and transmission of electricity consumed in the WWTPs. Wastewater recovery and co-incineration of sewage sludge in cement kiln ensure significant environmental savings on ozone layer depletion, human toxicity, acidification, photochemical oxidation, and abiotic depletion (fossil fuel) potential. Considering NEB approach, the highest NEB values were found for the WWTPs with the higher organic load and nutrient concentration in the influent. The results of LCC in WWTPs varied between 0.21 and 0.53 €/m3. External (environmental) costs were evaluated higher than internal (operational) costs for all selected WWTPs. While eutrophication was the highest among environmental costs, electricity cost was the highest among operational costs for almost all WWTPs.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 152 条
[1]  
Arendt R(2020)Comparison of different monetization methods in LCA: A review Sustainability 12 10493-68
[2]  
Bachmann TM(2019)Environmental and cost life cycle assessment of different alternatives for improvement of wastewater treatment plants in developing countries Science of the Total Environment 660 57-105
[3]  
Motoshita M(2015)An evaluation of railway passenger transport in Turkey using life cycle assessment and life cycle cost methods Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 41 88-23
[4]  
Awad H(2018)Life cycle assessment indicators of urban wastewater and sewage sludge treatment Ecological Indicators 94 13-1014
[5]  
Alalm MG(2021)Life cycle-based evaluation of environmental impacts and external costs of treated wastewater reuse for irrigation: A case study in southern Italy Journal of Cleaner Production 293 126142-1631
[6]  
El-Etriby HK(2019)A comparative life cycle assessment for sustainable cement production in Turkey Journal of Environmental Management 249 109362-1138
[7]  
Banar M(2022)An environmental and economic assessment based on life cycle approaches for industrial wastewater treatment and water recovery Journal of Water Process Engineering 49 103002-277
[8]  
Özdemir A(2020)The application of life cycle assessment (LCA) to wastewater treatment: A best practice guide and critical review Water Research 184 116058-64
[9]  
Buonocore E(2022)Comparative evaluation of different operation scenarios for a full-scale wastewater treatment plant: Modeling coupled with life cycle assessment Journal of Cleaner Production 341 130864-271
[10]  
Mellino S(2019)Site-specific carbon footprints of Scandinavian wastewater treatment plants, using the life cycle assessment approach Journal of Cleaner Production 211 1001-45120