Seasonal residence and counterurbanization: the role of second homes in population redistribution in Finland

被引:44
作者
Adamiak C. [1 ]
Pitkänen K. [2 ]
Lehtonen O. [3 ]
机构
[1] Faculty of Earth Sciences, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Toruń
[2] Environmental Policy Centre, Finnish Environment Institute (SYKE), Joensuu
[3] Rural Policy and Rural Research, Natural Resources Institute Finland, Helsinki
关键词
Counterurbanization; Finland; Population deconcentration; Seasonal population; Second homes;
D O I
10.1007/s10708-016-9727-x
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Since the late twentieth century, many developed countries have experienced population deconcentration, labelled as counterurbanization. There has been an academic discussion on the meaning, validity and universality of this concept, drivers of counterurbanization and its impacts on rural areas. To date, research on counterurbanization mostly apply static and discrete definitions of residence, migration and population, which is an increasingly simplistic view in the contemporary reality of a growing multitude of forms of mobility, often related to dual residence. Particularly large-scale quantitative studies on counterurbanization are confined by existing statistical practices. This paper attempts to overcome this obstacle and describe the transformation of the settlement system in Finland acknowledging the role of second home mobility. To achieve this goal, it introduces two alternative measures of population, seasonal and average population, and analyses their spatial dynamics between the years 1990 and 2010 based on georeferenced grid statistical data. The study finds that although registered population has been concentrating during the period in analysis, seasonal population has been increasingly dispersed due to the growing number of second homes. It shows that the counterurbanization process, though not noticed by conventional statistics, does occur in Finland, manifested by seasonal rather than permanent moves. The article concludes that various forms of mobility should be taken into account when analysing the urban–rural population dynamics and transformations of settlement systems as well as in rural development planning. © 2016, The Author(s).
引用
收藏
页码:1035 / 1050
页数:15
相关论文
共 80 条
[31]  
Hoover E.M., Interstate redistribution of population, 1850–1940, The Journal of Economic History, 1, 2, pp. 199-205, (1941)
[32]  
Jaakson R., Second-home domestic tourism, Annals of Tourism Research, 13, 3, pp. 367-391, (1986)
[33]  
Jauhiainen J.S., Will the retiring baby boomers return to rural periphery?, Journal of Rural Studies, 25, 1, pp. 25-34, (2009)
[34]  
Johnson K.M., Nucci A., Long L., Population trends in metropolitan and nonmetropolitan America: Selective deconcentration and the rural rebound, Population Research and Policy Review, 24, 5, pp. 527-542, (2005)
[35]  
Kaltenborn B.P., The alternate homes—Motives of recreation home use, Norwegian Journal of Geography, 52, 3, pp. 121-134, (1998)
[36]  
Kauppila P., Rusanen J., A grid cell viewpoint to resorts: Case studies in northern Finland, Scandinavian Journal of Hospitality and Tourism, 9, 1, pp. 1-21, (2009)
[37]  
Kontuly T., Vogelsang R., Explanations for the intensification of counterurbanization in the Federal Republic of Germany, The Professional Geographer, 40, 1, pp. 42-54, (1988)
[38]  
Kotavaara O., Antikainen H., Rusanen J., Population change and accessibility by road and rail networks: GIS and statistical approach to Finland 1970–2007, Journal of Transport Geography, 19, 4, pp. 926-935, (2011)
[39]  
Kupiszewski M., Heikkila E., Nieminen M., Durham H., Rees P., Kupiszewska D., Internal migration and regional population dynamics in Europe: Finland case study, (2000)
[40]  
Lehtonen O., Space–time dependence in regional development: The geospatial approach to understanding the development processes in small-scale areas in Finland, Dissertations in Social Sciences and Business Studies 105, (2015)