Seasonal residence and counterurbanization: the role of second homes in population redistribution in Finland

被引:44
作者
Adamiak C. [1 ]
Pitkänen K. [2 ]
Lehtonen O. [3 ]
机构
[1] Faculty of Earth Sciences, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Toruń
[2] Environmental Policy Centre, Finnish Environment Institute (SYKE), Joensuu
[3] Rural Policy and Rural Research, Natural Resources Institute Finland, Helsinki
关键词
Counterurbanization; Finland; Population deconcentration; Seasonal population; Second homes;
D O I
10.1007/s10708-016-9727-x
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Since the late twentieth century, many developed countries have experienced population deconcentration, labelled as counterurbanization. There has been an academic discussion on the meaning, validity and universality of this concept, drivers of counterurbanization and its impacts on rural areas. To date, research on counterurbanization mostly apply static and discrete definitions of residence, migration and population, which is an increasingly simplistic view in the contemporary reality of a growing multitude of forms of mobility, often related to dual residence. Particularly large-scale quantitative studies on counterurbanization are confined by existing statistical practices. This paper attempts to overcome this obstacle and describe the transformation of the settlement system in Finland acknowledging the role of second home mobility. To achieve this goal, it introduces two alternative measures of population, seasonal and average population, and analyses their spatial dynamics between the years 1990 and 2010 based on georeferenced grid statistical data. The study finds that although registered population has been concentrating during the period in analysis, seasonal population has been increasingly dispersed due to the growing number of second homes. It shows that the counterurbanization process, though not noticed by conventional statistics, does occur in Finland, manifested by seasonal rather than permanent moves. The article concludes that various forms of mobility should be taken into account when analysing the urban–rural population dynamics and transformations of settlement systems as well as in rural development planning. © 2016, The Author(s).
引用
收藏
页码:1035 / 1050
页数:15
相关论文
共 80 条
[1]  
Adamiak C., Vepsalainen M., Strandell A., Hiltunen M.J., Pitkanen K., Hall C.M., Second home tourism in Finland: Perceptions of citizens and municipalities on state and development of second home tourism, Reports of Finnish Environment Institute 22en/2015, (2015)
[2]  
Akerlund U., Pitkanen K., Hiltunen M.J., Overvag K., Muller D., Kahila P., Health, well-being and second homes: An outline of current research and policy challenges, Matkailututkimus, 11, 1, pp. 43-54, (2015)
[3]  
Alestalo J., The concentration of population in Finland between 1880 and 1980, Fennia, 161, 2, pp. 263-288, (1983)
[4]  
Amcoff J., Rural population growth in Sweden in the 1990s: Unexpected reality or spatial–statistical chimera?, Population, Space and Place, 12, 3, pp. 171-185, (2006)
[5]  
Bell M., Ward G., Comparing temporary mobility with permanent migration, Tourism Geographies, 2, 1, pp. 97-107, (2000)
[6]  
Berry B.J.L., Urbanization and counter-urbanization, (1976)
[7]  
Berry B.J.L., Migration reversals in perspective: The long-wave evidence, International Regional Science Review, 11, 3, pp. 245-251, (1988)
[8]  
Boyle P., Halfacree K., Migration into rural areas: Theories and issues, (1998)
[9]  
Buller H., Hoggart K., International counterurbanization: British migrants in rural France, (1994)
[10]  
Champion A.G., Counterurbanization: The changing pace and nature of population deconcentration, (1989)