Diagnostic accuracy of MDCT coronary angiography in patients referred for heart valve surgery

被引:17
作者
Stagnaro, N. [1 ]
Della Latta, D. [1 ]
Chiappino, D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Genoa, I-16132 Genoa, Italy
来源
RADIOLOGIA MEDICA | 2009年 / 114卷 / 05期
关键词
Multidetector-row computed tomography; Conventional coronary angiography; Coronary artery disease; Valvular heart disease; Cardiac surgery; MULTIDETECTOR ROW CT; COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; ARTERY-DISEASE; ASSOCIATION; CALCIFICATION; STENOSIS;
D O I
10.1007/s11547-009-0403-9
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
The aim of our study was to evaluate the role of multidetector-row computed tomography (MDCT) in patients referred for heart valve surgery. We studied the diagnostic performance of CT coronary angiography (CTCA) compared with conventional coronary angiography (CCA) before valve surgery. During a 13-month period, 55 consecutive patients under evaluation for aortic (40/55) or mitral valve (15/55) disease before potential valve replacement underwent CTCA using a 64-detector-row scanner within 2 months of CCA for comparative purposes. All 17 major coronary artery segments were evaluated by one observer and compared with the reference standard. Patient-based, vessel-based and segment-based analyses of the data were performed. Prevalence of significant coronary artery disease, defined as having at least one stenosis a parts per thousand yen50% per patient, was 36%. On a patient-based analysis, sensitivity, specificity and positive and negative predictive values were 100%, 91%, 83% and 100%, respectively. The diagnostic accuracy of 64-row CTCA for ruling out the presence of significant coronary stenoses in patients undergoing valve surgery is excellent and allows CTCA to be used as a gatekeeper for invasive CCA in these patients. MDCT is a necessary preoperative examination that provides useful information for identifying potential operative complications of surgical procedures.
引用
收藏
页码:728 / 742
页数:15
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   The value of percutaneous coronary intervention in aortic valve stenosis with coronary artery disease [J].
Alcalai, Ronny ;
Viola, Nicola ;
Mosseri, Morris ;
Beeri, Ronen ;
Leibowitz, David ;
Lotan, Chaim ;
Gilon, Dan .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2007, 120 (02) :185.e7-185.e13
[2]   Guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease - Executive summary - A report of the American College of Cardiology American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines (committee on management of patients with valvular heart disease) [J].
Bonow, RO ;
Carabello, B ;
de Leon, AC ;
Edmunds, LH ;
Fedderly, BJ ;
Freed, MD ;
Gaasch, WH ;
McKay, CR ;
Nishimura, RA ;
O'Gara, PT ;
O'Rourke, RA ;
Rahimtoola, SH ;
Ritchie, JL ;
Cheitlin, MD ;
Eagle, KA ;
Gardner, TJ ;
Garson, A ;
Gibbons, RJ ;
Russell, RO ;
Ryan, TJ ;
Smith, SC .
CIRCULATION, 1998, 98 (18) :1949-1984
[3]   Cardiac valve calcification: characteristics of patients with calcification of the mitral annulus or aortic valve [J].
Boon, A ;
Cheriex, E ;
Lodder, J ;
Kessels, F .
HEART, 1997, 78 (05) :472-474
[4]   Pitfalls, artifacts, and remedies in multi-detector row CT coronary angiography [J].
Choi, HS ;
Choi, BW ;
Choe, KO ;
Choi, DH ;
Yoo, KJ ;
Kim, MI ;
Kim, J .
RADIOGRAPHICS, 2004, 24 (03) :787-800
[5]  
CZER LS, 2007, J THORAC CARDIOVAS S, V95, P390
[6]  
Hayek E, 2005, LANCET, V365, P507
[7]  
Iung B, 1993, J Heart Valve Dis, V2, P430
[8]  
JOHNSON LW, 1991, J AM COLL CARDIOL, V33, P1756
[9]   Atrial fibrillation after surgical correction of mitral regurgitation in sinus rhythm - Incidence, outcome, and determinants [J].
Kernis, SJ ;
Nkomo, VT ;
Messika-Zeitoun, D ;
Gersh, BJ ;
Sundt, TM ;
Ballman, KV ;
Scott, CG ;
Schaff, HV ;
Enriquez-Sarano, M .
CIRCULATION, 2004, 110 (16) :2320-2325
[10]   16-detector row computed tomographic coronary angiography in patients undergoing evaluation for aortic valve replacement: comparison with catheter angiography [J].
Manghat, N. E. ;
Morgan-Hughes, G. J. ;
Broadley, A. J. ;
Undy, M. B. ;
Wright, D. ;
Marshall, A. J. ;
Roobottom, C. A. .
CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 2006, 61 (09) :749-757