Different bacterial and fungal community patterns in restored habitats in coal-mining subsidence areas

被引:0
作者
Yijing Wang
Guodong Zheng
Yongkang Zhao
Huaizhi Bo
Changchao Li
Junyu Dong
Yan Wang
Shuwan Yan
Fanglong Zhang
Jian Liu
机构
[1] Shandong University,Environment Research Institute
[2] Shandong Provincial Lunan Geology and Exploration Institute (Shandong Provincial Bureau of Geology and Mineral Resources No.2 Geological Brigade),Technology Innovation Center of Restoration and Reclamation in Mining induced Subsidence Land, Ministry of Nat
[3] Beijing Normal University,Key Laboratory of Water and Sediment Sciences of Ministry of Education, School of Environment
来源
Environmental Science and Pollution Research | 2023年 / 30卷
关键词
Coal-mining subsidence areas; Ecological restoration; Microbial diversity; Soil microbiota; Taxonomic composition;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Soil microbiota, which plays a fundamental role in ecosystem functioning, is sensitive to environmental changes. Studying soil microbial ecological patterns can help to understand the consequences of environmental disturbances on soil microbiota and hence ecosystem services. The different habitats with critical environmental gradients generated through the restoration of coal-mining subsidence areas provide an ideal area to explore the response of soil microbiota to environmental changes. Here, based on high-throughput sequencing, we revealed the patterns of soil bacterial and fungal communities in habitats with different land-use types (wetland, farmland, and grassland) and with different restored times which were generated during the ecological restoration of a typical coal-mining subsidence area in Jining City, China. The α-diversity of bacterial was higher in wetland than in farmland and grassland, while that of fungi had no discrepancy among the three habitats. The β-diversity of bacterial community in the grassland was lower than in the farmland, and fungal community was significant different in all three habitats, showing wetland, grassland, and farmland from high to low. The β-diversity of the bacterial community decreased with restoration time while that of the fungal community had no significant change in the longer-restoration-time area. Furthermore, soil electrical conductivity was the most important driver for both bacterial and fungal communities. Based on the taxonomic difference among different habitats, we identified a group of biomarkers for each habitat. The study contributes to understand the microbial patterns during the ecological restoration of coal-mining subsidence areas, which has implications for the efficient ecological restoration of subsidence areas.
引用
收藏
页码:104304 / 104318
页数:14
相关论文
共 418 条
[1]  
Averill C(2022)Defending Earth’s terrestrial microbiome Nat Microbiol 7 1717-1725
[2]  
Anthony MA(2018)Structure and function of the global topsoil microbiome Nature 560 233-237
[3]  
Baldrian P(2012)Active and total microbial communities in forest soil are largely different and highly stratified during decomposition ISME J 6 248-258
[4]  
Finkbeiner F(2017)Is soil microbial diversity affected by soil and groundwater salinity? Evidences from a coastal system in central Italy Environ Monit Assess 189 319-21
[5]  
van den Hoogen J(2017)Plant diversity represents the prevalent determinant of soil fungal community structure across temperate grasslands in northern China Soil Biol Biochem 110 12-273
[6]  
Kiers T(2019)Effects of salinity on the biological performance of anaerobic membrane bioreactor J Environ Manage 238 263-1645
[7]  
Kohout P(2021)Analysis of mining-induced variation of the water table and potential benefits for ecological vegetation: a case study of Jinjitan coal mine in Yushenfu mining area, China Hydrogeol J 29 1629-811
[8]  
Hirt E(2022)Soil microbiota as game-changers in restoration of degraded lands Science 375 990-325
[9]  
Smith GR(2013)Controls on soil microbial community stability under climate change Front Microbiol 4 265-E1332
[10]  
Crowther TW(2005)Living in a fungal world: impact of fungi on soil bacterial niche development FEMS Microbiol Rev 29 795-124