Assessing the effects of tDCS over a delayed response inhibition task by targeting the right inferior frontal gyrus and right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex

被引:0
作者
Davide Francesco Stramaccia
Barbara Penolazzi
Giulia Sartori
Miriam Braga
Sara Mondini
Giovanni Galfano
机构
[1] University of Padua,Department of Developmental and Social Psychology
[2] University of Trieste,Department of Life Sciences
[3] University of Padua,Department of General Psychology
[4] University of Padua,Human Inspired Technology Research Center
[5] Casa di Cura Figlie di S. Camillo,Center for Cognitive Neuroscience
[6] University of Padua,undefined
来源
Experimental Brain Research | 2015年 / 233卷
关键词
Transcranial direct current stimulation; Inhibitory motor control; Response stopping; Dorsolateral prefrontal cortex; Inferior frontal gyrus; Noninvasive brain stimulation;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Many situations in our everyday life call for a mechanism deputed to outright stop an ongoing course of action. This behavioral inhibition ability, known as response stopping, is often impaired in psychiatric conditions characterized by impulsivity and poor inhibitory control. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has recently been proposed as a tool for modulating response stopping in such clinical populations, and previous studies in healthy humans have already shown that this noninvasive brain stimulation technique is effectively able to improve response stopping, as measured in a stop-signal task (SST) administered immediately after the stimulation. So far, the right inferior frontal gyrus (rIFG) has been the main focus of these attempts to modulate response stopping by the means of noninvasive brain stimulation. However, other cortical areas such as the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (rDLPFC) have been implicated in inhibitory control with other paradigms. In order to provide new insight about the involvement of these areas in response stopping, in the present study, tDCS was delivered to 115 healthy subjects, using five stimulation setups that differed in terms of target area (rIFG or rDLPFC) and polarity of stimulation (anodal, cathodal, or sham). The SST was performed 15 min after the offset of the stimulation. Consistently with previous studies, only anodal stimulation over rIFG induced a reliable, although weak, improvement in the SST, which was specific for response stopping, as it was not mirrored in more general reaction time measures.
引用
收藏
页码:2283 / 2290
页数:7
相关论文
共 227 条
  • [1] Anderson MC(2003)Rethinking interference theory: executive control and the mechanisms of forgetting J Mem Lang 49 415-445
  • [2] Aron AR(2003)Stop-signal inhibition disrupted by damage to right inferior frontal gyrus in humans Nat Neurosci 6 115-116
  • [3] Fletcher PC(2007)Triangulating a cognitive control network using diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and functional MRI J Neurosci 27 3743-3752
  • [4] Bullmore ET(2014)Inhibition and the right inferior frontal cortex: one decade on Trends Cogn Sci 18 177-185
  • [5] Sahakian BJ(2015)Recent advances in understanding neural systems that support inhibitory control Curr Opin Behav Sci 1 17-22
  • [6] Robbins TW(2013)Partially non-linear stimulation intensity-dependent effects of direct current stimulation on motor cortex excitability in humans J Physiol 591 1987-2000
  • [7] Aron AR(2008)Modulating presence and impulsiveness by external stimulation of the brain Behav Brain Funct 4 33-300
  • [8] Behrens TE(1995)Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing J R Stat Soc Series B Stat Methodol 57 289-13
  • [9] Smith S(2006)Effect of low-frequency transcranial magnetic stimulation on an affective go/no-go task in patients with major depression: role of stimulation site and depression severity Psychiatry Res 141 1-436
  • [10] Frank MJ(2014)Hits and misses: leveraging tDCS to advance cognitive research Front Psychol 5 800-1034