Statin use is associated with lower risk of dementia in stroke patients: a community-based cohort study with inverse probability weighted marginal structural model analysis

被引:0
作者
Zhirong Yang
Sengwee Toh
Xiaojuan Li
Duncan Edwards
Carol Brayne
Jonathan Mant
机构
[1] University of Cambridge,Primary Care Unit, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, School of Clinical Medicine
[2] Harvard Medical School &,Department of Population Medicine
[3] Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute,Cambridge Public Health, School of Clinical Medicine
[4] University of Cambridge,undefined
来源
European Journal of Epidemiology | 2022年 / 37卷
关键词
Statins; Stroke; Dementia; Cohort study;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Current evidence is inconclusive on cognitive benefits or harms of statins among stroke patients, who have high risk of dementia. This observational cohort study investigated the association between statin use and post-stroke dementia using data from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink. Patients without prior dementia who had an incident stroke but received no statins in the preceding year were followed for up to 10 years. We used inverse probability weighted marginal structural models to estimate observational analogues of intention-to-treat (ITT, statin initiation vs. no initiation) and per-protocol (PP, sustained statin use vs. no use) effects on the risk of dementia. To explore potential impact of unmeasured confounding, we examined the risks of coronary heart disease (CHD, positive control outcome), fracture and peptic ulcer (negative control outcomes). In 18,577 statin initiators and 14,613 non-initiators (mean follow-up of 4.2 years), the adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) for dementia was 0.70 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.64–0.75) in ITT analysis and 0.55 (95% CI 0.50–0.62) in PP analysis. The corresponding aHRITT and aHRPP were 0.87 (95% CI 0.79–0.95) and 0.70 (95% CI 0.62–0.80) for CHD, 1.03 (95% CI 0.82–1.29) and 1.09 (95% CI 0.77–1.54) for peptic ulcer, and 0.88 (95% CI 0.80–0.96) and 0.86 (95% CI 0.75–0.98) for fracture. Statin initiation after stroke was associated with lower risk of dementia, with a potentially greater benefit in patients who persisted with statins over time. The observed association of statin use with post-stroke dementia may in part be overestimated due to unmeasured confounding shared with the association between statin use and fracture.
引用
收藏
页码:615 / 627
页数:12
相关论文
共 176 条
  • [1] Pendlebury ST(2009)Prevalence, incidence, and factors associated with pre-stroke and post-stroke dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis Lancet Neurol 8 1006-1018
  • [2] Rothwell PM(2017)Post-stroke dementia: a comprehensive review BMC Med 15 11-188
  • [3] Mijajlovic MD(2020)2019 ESC/EAS Guidelines for the management of dyslipidaemias: lipid modification to reduce cardiovascular risk Eur Heart J 41 111-e1081
  • [4] Pavlovic A(2019)2018 AHA/ACC/AACVPR/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/ADA/AGS/APhA/ASPC/NLA/PCNA guideline on the management of blood cholesterol: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines Circulation 139 e1046-2985
  • [5] Brainin M(2009)Non-adherence to statin therapy: a major challenge for preventive cardiology Expert Opin Pharmacother 10 2973-698
  • [6] Mach F(2014)Impact of statin adherence on cardiovascular disease and mortality outcomes: a systematic review Br J Clin Pharmacol 78 684-2060
  • [7] Baigent C(2015)Guidelines for the management of spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association Stroke 46 2032-668
  • [8] Catapano AL(2018)Does treating vascular risk factors prevent dementia and Alzheimer's disease? A systematic review and meta-analysis J Alzheimers Dis 64 657-1306
  • [9] Grundy SM(2015)Meta-analysis of modifiable risk factors for Alzheimer's disease J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 86 1299-1221
  • [10] Stone NJ(2014)Unintended effects of statins from observational studies in the general population: systematic review and meta-analysis BMC Med 12 51-229