Differential Susceptibility to Environmental Influences

被引:54
作者
Belsky J. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] University of California, Davis
来源
International Journal of Child Care and Education Policy | 2013年 / 7卷 / 2期
关键词
early childhood education and care; ethnic minority children; policy; preschool; special needs children;
D O I
10.1007/2288-6729-7-2-15
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Evidence that adverse rearing environments exert negative effects particularly on children and adults presumed “vulnerable” for temperamental or genetic reasons may actually reflect something else: heightened susceptibility to the negative effects of risky environments and to the beneficial effects of supportive environments. Building on Belsky’s (1997, 2005; Belsky & Pluess, 2009) evolutionary-inspired differential susceptibility hypothesis stipulating that some individuals, including children, are more affected—both for better and for worse—by their environmental exposures and developmental experiences, recent research consistent with this claim is reviewed. It reveals that in many cases, including both observational field studies and experimental intervention ones, putatively vulnerable children and adults are especially susceptible to both positive and negative environmental effects. In addition to reviewing relevant evidence, unknowns in the differential-susceptibility equation are highlighted. © 2013, Korea Institute of Child Care and Education.
引用
收藏
页码:15 / 31
页数:16
相关论文
共 66 条
  • [1] Bakermans-Kranenburg M.J., Van IJzendoorn M.H., Research Review: genetic vulnerability or differential susceptibility in child development: the case of attachment, Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 48, 12, pp. 1160-1173, (2007)
  • [2] Bakermans-Kranenburg M.J., van IJzendoorn M.H., Differential susceptibility to rearing environment depending on dopamine-related genes: new evidence and a meta-analysis, Development and Psychopathology, 23, 1, pp. 39-52, (2011)
  • [3] Beach S.R.H., Brody G.H., Lei M.-K., Philibert R.A., Differential Susceptibility to Parenting Among African American Youths: Testing the DRD4 Hypothesis, Journal of Family Psychology, 24, 5, pp. 513-521, (2010)
  • [4] Beach S.R.H., Lei M.K., Brody G.H., Simons R.L., Cutrona C., Philibert R.A., Genetic Moderation of Contextual Effects on Negative Arousal and Parenting in African-American Parents, Journal of Family Psychology, 26, 1, pp. 46-55, (2012)
  • [5] Beaver K.M., Sak A., Vaske J., Nilsson J., Genetic risk, parent-child relations, and antisocial phenotypes in a sample of African-American males, Psychiatry Research, 175, pp. 160-164, (2010)
  • [6] Belsky J., Variation in susceptibility to rearing influence: An evolutionary argument, Psychological Inquiry, 8, pp. 182-186, (1997)
  • [7] Belsky J., Differential susceptibility to rearing influence: An evolutionary hypothesis and some evidence, Origins of the social mind: Evolutionary psychology and child development, pp. 139-163, (2005)
  • [8] Belsky J., Bakermans-Kranenburg M.J., van IJzendoorn M.H., For better and for worse: Differential Susceptibility to environmental influences, Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16, 6, pp. 300-304, (2007)
  • [9] Belsky J., Beaver K.M., Cumulative-genetic plasticity, parenting and adolescent self-control/regulation, Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 52, 5, pp. 619-626, (2011)
  • [10] Belsky J., Hsieh K., Crnic K., Mothering, fathering, and infant negativity as antecedents of boys’ externalizing problems and inhibition at age 3: Differential susceptibility to rearing influence?, Development and Psychopathology, 10, pp. 301-319, (1998)