Reviewing the strategies for climate change and sustainability after the US defiance of the Paris Agreement: an AHP–GMCR-based conflict resolution approach

被引:0
作者
Sharafat Ali
Haiyan Xu
Najid Ahmad
机构
[1] Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics,College of Economics and Management
[2] Government Postgraduate College Kot Sultan,Department of Economics
[3] Hunan University of Science and Technology,School of Business
来源
Environment, Development and Sustainability | 2021年 / 23卷
关键词
Paris Agreement; Climate change; Environmental decision-making; Climate governance; Influence-power; Preference; Attitude-based analysis;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In the landmark Paris Agreement, the global economies agreed to put forward their best efforts in mitigation and adaptation of climate change. The member countries set their international and national targets to limit global temperature rise within 2 °C. The major and developed economics play a productive role in achieving the goals set in the Paris Agreement and failing would make it hard for the global community to limit the global temperature within the targeted range. The announcement of the USA to back out of the Paris Agreement has caused uncertainty in the global climate governance (GCG) regime. The present study overviews how the US defiance is likely to affect emission space, carbon prices, and macroeconomic conditions of the economies. It also focuses on the objective to analyze multiple strategic scenarios regarding GCG considering the role of three major contributors to GHG emissions—the USA, the EU, and China. An integrated conflict resolution strategy has been proposed by combining the analytical hierarchy process and attitude-based graph model for conflict resolution. The possible post-withdrawal scenarios based on possible alternatives for the GCG regime has been examined. This study incorporates influence power-based and attitude-based approaches to generate preference rankings of the alternative GCG strategies. The influence power-based and attitude-based preferences are used in general stability and attitude-based stability analyses to explore equilibrium GCG strategies. The analyses reveal that influence power and attitudes of the decision-makers (DMs) influence the preferences of DMs. This influence on preferences has implications on the outcomes of the GCG scenarios. The results of the influence power-based and attitude-based analyses imply that the collective GCG strategies are indispensable to protect the shared natural climate for environmental sustainability and development.
引用
收藏
页码:11881 / 11912
页数:31
相关论文
共 97 条
[1]  
Ahmad N(2017)Effects of energy production and CO2 emissions on economic growth in Iran: ARDL approach Energy 123 521-537
[2]  
Du L(2018)Chinese growth and dilemmas: modelling energy consumption, CO Quality and Quantity 52 2111-2132
[3]  
Ahmad N(2018) emissions and growth in China Quality and Quantity 29 493-502
[4]  
Du L(2020)Knowledge spillover effects: empirical evidence from Russian regions Business Strategy and the Environment 18 221-238
[5]  
Tian X-L(2019)The role of environmental innovation through the technological proximity in the implementation of the sustainable development International Journal of Global Warming 22 3839-3860
[6]  
Wang J(2020)Resolving strategic conflict for environmental conservation of glacial ecosystem: An attitudinal conflict resolution approach Environment, Development and Sustainability 53 561-581
[7]  
Aldieri L(2019)Metro design and heritage sustainability: conflict analysis using attitude based on options in the graph model Quality and Quantity 28 356-381
[8]  
Kotsemir MN(2019)Energy sources choice and environmental sustainability disputes: An evolutional graph model approach Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering 11 94-106
[9]  
Vinci CP(2017)Evolutional attitude based on option prioritization for conflict analysis of urban transport planning in Pakistan The Open Cybernetics and Systemics Journal 8 226-234
[10]  
Aldieri L(2017)The analysis of environmental conflict in Changzhou foreign language school using a hybrid game Advances in Climate Change Research 3 272-278