State-of-the-art and perspectives in the heavy mineral industry of Sri Lanka

被引:0
作者
H. C. S. Subasinghe
Amila Sandaruwan Ratnayake
K. A. G. Sameera
机构
[1] Uva Wellassa University,Department of Applied Earth Sciences, Faculty of Applied Sciences
[2] Geological Survey and Mines Bureau,undefined
来源
Mineral Economics | 2021年 / 34卷
关键词
Heavy minerals; Sri Lanka; Value addition; Sustainable utilisation;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Heavy minerals have become an essential commodity in modern-day technology. The objective of this study is to examine the current status of the heavy mineral industry of Sri Lanka. The present study also examines the economic viability of potential heavy mineral placer deposits, based on geochemical data. Field investigations suggested the occurrence of heavy minerals as beach-placers, and inland/raised beach deposits along the coastline of Sri Lanka. Geochemical results showed the enrichment of TiO2, Fe2O3, Al2O3, and trace elements, and depletion of other major oxides such as Na2O, K2O, MnO, MgO, CaO, and P2O5. Consequently, it suggests the abundance of ilmenite, leucoxene, rutile, sillimanite, garnet, and rare earth element (REE)-bearing heavy minerals in potential placer deposits. In contrast, this study illustrates the exported quantity (in the weight ratio of 35:3:1) of ilmenite, rutile, and zircon minerals during the last decade. Ilmenite is the dominant heavy mineral in Sri Lanka, and thus, its production and price volatilisations are essential to understand the current status and predict the future behaviour of the heavy mineral industry. Statistical observations suggest that the global production and unit price variations of ilmenite have increased gradually from 1950 to 2015. Besides, the forecasted variations in annual global production and unit price changes of ilmenite indicate healthy compound annual growth rates of 1.27% and 1.43%, respectively. However, Sri Lanka has less contribution (< 1%) to global ilmenite production. Consequently, the value addition of ilmenite must be highly encouraged with at least an immediate stage (e.g. synthetic rutile). The present study also highlights possible value addition stages of available heavy mineral resources (low-, intermediate-, or high-level value addition), and discusses action plans to improve the quality of the heavy mineral industry of Sri Lanka. In recommendations, imposing sustainable regulations and policies would uplift the heavy mineral industry of Sri Lanka. For example, value addition to local heavy minerals and terminating raw commodity export are highly recommended.
引用
收藏
页码:427 / 439
页数:12
相关论文
共 67 条
  • [1] Amalan K(2018)Influence of nearshore sediment dynamics on the distribution of heavy mineral placer deposits in Sri Lanka Environ Earth Sci 77 737-37
  • [2] Ratnayake AS(1993)Chemical composition and evolution of the upper continental crust: contrasting results from surface samples and shales Chem Geol 104 1-222
  • [3] Ratnayake NP(2020)The story of rare earth elements (REEs): occurrences, global distribution, genesis, geology, mineralogy and global production Ore Geol Rev 122 103521-125
  • [4] Weththasinghe SM(2016)Rare earths: market disruption, innovation, and global supply chains Annu Rev Environ Resour 41 199-109
  • [5] Dushyantha N(2020)Mining productivity and the fourth industrial revolution Miner Econ 33 115-115
  • [6] Lakmali N(2020)Future availability of non-renewable metal resources and the influence of environmental, social, and governance conflicts on metal production Commun Earth Environ 1 13-96
  • [7] Premasiri R(2004)Reductive leaching of ilmenite ore in hydrochloric acid for preparation of synthetic rutile Hydrometallurgy 73 99-49
  • [8] Condie KC(2010)The environmental sustainability of mining in Australia: key mega-trends and looming constraints Res Policy 35 98-247
  • [9] Dushyantha N(2018)Microstructures and physical properties of waste garnets as a promising construction material Case Stud Constr Mater 8 87-491
  • [10] Batapola N(2021)Assessment of personal preferences concerning the social impacts of mining with choice experiment method Miner Econ 34 39-175