Influence of substrate type on periphyton biomass and nutrient state at contrasting high nutrient levels in a subtropical shallow lake

被引:0
作者
Na Zhang
Hongjing Li
Erik Jeppesen
Wei Li
机构
[1] Chinese Academy of Sciences,Key Laboratory of Aquatic Botany and Watershed Ecology, Wuhan Botanical Garden
[2] Chinese Academy of Sciences,Hubei Key Laboratory of Wetland Evolution & Ecological Restoration, Wuhan Botanical Garden
[3] Aarhus University,Department of Bioscience
[4] Sino-Danish Centre for Education and Research (SDC),undefined
来源
Hydrobiologia | 2013年 / 710卷
关键词
Periphyton accrual; Nutrients; Colonization time; Hard substrate; Mimicked plants; Hypereutrophication;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
How substrate affects periphyton biomass and nutrient state at different, but high, nutrient levels was tested in three large enclosures in a hypereutrophic subtropical shallow lake. We compared periphytic characteristics (1) on three hard substrates (stone, bamboo, and wood) incubated for 2 weeks and 1 year, respectively, to investigate the existence of the influences of substrate type at hypereutrophic levels, and (2) on artificial plants with contrasting (parvopotamid-like and myriophyllid-like) soft substrate morphology. In general, periphytic biomass and nutrient state were sensitive to variations in nutrient level, incubation time, hard substrate type (except 2-week incubated) and substrate morphology, but to a varying extent. The periphyton nutrient content increased with increasing nutrient levels on most substrates. Long-time incubated substrates supported more periphytic biomass, had a higher nutrient content and autotrophic proportion, while the effect of nutrient level on nutrient content in the periphyton was independent of incubation time. The effects of hard substrate type on periphyton characteristics were much weaker than those of nutrient level. By contrast, the effects of soft substrate morphology on periphyton biomass and carbon: nutrient ratios surpassed those of nutrient level. Chlorophyll a, dry mass, and ash free dry mass were much higher on parvopotamid than on myriophyllid substrates. Our results show that periphyton biomass and nutrient state are influenced by both substrate and nutrient level even in hypereutrophic lakes, which might have cascading effects on the benthic food web.
引用
收藏
页码:129 / 141
页数:12
相关论文
共 122 条
  • [1] Acs E(2008)Comparative algological and bacteriological examinations on biofilms developed on different substrata in a shallow soda lake Aquatic Ecology 42 521-531
  • [2] Kiss KT(2003)The effects of periphyton substrate and fish stocking density on water quality, phytoplankton, periphyton and fish growth Aquaculture Research 34 685-695
  • [3] Szabo KE(2000)Responses of a lake outlet community to light and nutrient manipulation: effects on periphyton and invertebrate biomass and composition Freshwater Biology 44 629-639
  • [4] Borsodi AK(2005)Changes in stoichiometric constraints on epilithon and benthic macroinvertebrates in response to slight nutrient enrichment of mountain rivers Freshwater Biology 50 1836-1852
  • [5] Vladar P(2007)Nutrient limitation of benthic algae in Lake Michigan: the role of silica Journal of Phycology 43 228-234
  • [6] Kiss E(1992)How artificial are artificial substrata for periphyton? Journal of the North American Benthological Society 11 244-256
  • [7] Varbiro G(2001)Comparison of usefulness of three types of artificial substrata (glass, wood and plastic) when studying settlement patterns of periphyton in lakes of different trophic status Journal of Microbiological Methods 45 167-170
  • [8] Zaray G(2002)Periphyton communities on natural substrata in eu-, meso- and oligotrophic lakes at higher latitude Biologia 57 433-436
  • [9] Azim ME(1980)The composition and ecology of periphyton communities in freshwaters. I. The influence of host type and external environment on community composition British Phycological Journal 15 429-446
  • [10] Verdegem MCJ(1996)Functional differences in epiphytic microbial communities in nutrient-rich freshwater ecosystems: an assay of denitrifying capacity Freshwater Biology 36 555-562