Proposal for environmental mixture risk assessment in the context of the biocidal product authorization in the EU

被引:27
作者
Backhaus T. [1 ]
Altenburger R. [2 ]
Faust M. [3 ]
Frein D. [4 ]
Frische T. [4 ]
Johansson P. [5 ]
Kehrer A. [4 ]
Porsbring T. [6 ]
机构
[1] Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Gothenburg, 40530 Gothenburg
[2] UFZ - Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research, UFZ, Department Bioanalytical Ecotoxicology, 04318 Leipzig
[3] Faust and Backhaus, Environmental Consulting, Bremen
[4] Federal Environment Agency
[5] Swedish Chemicals Agency
[6] Institute for Health and Consumer Protection, European Commission's Joint Research Centre
关键词
Biocides; Mixture toxicity; Regulatory environmental risk assessment;
D O I
10.1186/2190-4715-25-4
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The EU Council and Parliament recently agreed on a new regulation that will implement a new EU-wide, harmonized system for the authorization for biocidal products. Such products are in most cases multi-component mixtures of one or more active substances plus a range of co-formulants that serve different purposes, e.g. as stabilizers or preservatives. They are only allowed on the European market if their intended use does not lead to unacceptable risks for the environment. Consequently, the assessment of possible combination effects is a critically important step during the regulatory environmental risk assessment of biocidal products. However, no specific guidance is at hand on how combination effects should be accounted for during the regulatory environmental risk assessment of biocidal products. Results and Conclusions: A tiered approach was developed that accommodates different data situations, optimizes resource usage, limits biotesting as far as possible and ensures adequate protection of the environment. It mainly builds on using Concentration Addition as a component-based approach for mixture toxicity prediction, complemented by whole product tests where appropriate. Concentration Addition is either approximated by summing up PEC/PNEC ratios or as sums of toxic units. The competing concept of Independent Action was assessed as not being suitable for incorporation into a tiered approach without explicit confirmatory studies, as it might otherwise lead to an underestimation of the actual environmental risk. © 2013 Backhaus et al.; licensee Springer.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]  
Concerning the making available on the market and use of biocidal products, Official Journal L, 167, pp. 1-123, (2012)
[2]  
Concerning the placing of biocidal products on the market, Official Journal L, 123, pp. 1-0063, (1998)
[3]  
Technical Notes for Guidance in Support of Annex VI of Directive 98/8/EC of the European Parliament and the Council Concerning the Placing of Biocidal Products on the Market, (2008)
[4]  
Characterisation of dose [concentration]-response for environment, Guidance on Information Requirements and Chemical Safety Assessment, (2008)
[5]  
Backhaus T., Faust M., Blanck H., Hazard and Risk Assessment of Chemical Mixtures under REACH-State of the Art, Gaps and Options for Improvement, (2010)
[6]  
Kortenkamp A., Backhaus T., Faust M., State of the Art Report on Mixture Toxicity, (2009)
[7]  
Lowit A., Darit C., Powers F., Blancato J., Setzer R.W., Conolly R., Physiologically-based Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic Modeling and Cumulative Risk Assessment, (2004)
[8]  
Teuschler L.K., Rice G.E., Wilkes C.R., Lipscomb J.C., Power F.W., A feasibility study of cumulative risk assessment methods for drinking water disinfection by-product mixtures, Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health - Part A, 67, 8-10, pp. 755-777, (2004)
[9]  
Conolly R., Wang J., Tan Y., Physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling as an alternative to relative potency factors (RPFs) in cumulative risk assessment: An example with acetylcholinesterase- (AChE) inhibiting pesticides, Toxicological Science, 84, S-1, (2005)
[10]  
De Zwart D., Posthuma L., Complex mixture toxicity for single and multiple species: Proposed methodologies, Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 24, 10, pp. 2665-2676, (2005)