The RANK/RANKL/OPG triad in cancer-induced bone diseases

被引:0
作者
William C. Dougall
Michelle Chaisson
机构
[1] Amgen Washington,Department of Cancer Biology
来源
Cancer and Metastasis Reviews | 2006年 / 25卷
关键词
Receptor activator of NF-κB (RANK); RANKL; Osteoprotegerin (OPG); Osteoclasts; Bone metastasis;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The maintenance of skeletal integrity in a healthy individual requires a balanced regulation of the processes of bone formation, mediated by osteoblasts, and bone resorption, mediated by osteoclasts. This balanced process of bone remodeling becomes co-opted in the skeleton by tumor cells and this dramatically accelerates the process of remodeling and disrupts the normal equilibrium resulting in a spectrum of osteolytic to osteoblastic bone lesions. Certain tumor types, such as breast and prostate, frequently metastasize to the bone. It is now widely understood that the molecular triad—receptor activator of NF-κB ligand (RANKL), its receptor RANK, and the endogenous soluble RANKL inhibitor, osteoprotegerin (OPG)—play direct and essential roles in the formation, function, and survival of osteoclasts. Osteoclastic bone resorption contributes to the majority of skeletal sequelae, or skeletal-related events (SREs), in patients with bone metastases. In addition, osteoclastic bone resorption also contributes to the establishment of tumors in the skeleton. Therefore, blocking osteoclast activity and differentiation via RANKL inhibition may not only provide a beneficial treatment for skeletal complications of malignancy, but may also prevent bone metastases. In this review, we will first describe the operative role of osteoclasts and the RANK/RANKL/OPG triad in the pathophysiology of cancer-induced bone diseases, specifically solid tumor metastases to the bone. Secondly, we will describe a therapeutic approach that specifically targets the RANKL molecule.
引用
收藏
页码:541 / 549
页数:8
相关论文
共 392 条
  • [1] Coleman R. E.(1997)Skeletal complications of malignancy Cancer 80 1588-1594
  • [2] Mundy G. R.(2002)Metastasis to bone: Causes, consequences and therapeutic opportunities Nature Review Cancer 2 584-593
  • [3] Roodman G. D.(2004)Mechanisms of bone metastasis New England Journal of Medicine 350 1655-1664
  • [4] Taube T.(1994)Histomorphometric evidence for osteoclast-mediated bone resorption in metastatic breast cancer Bone 15 161-166
  • [5] Elomaa I.(2001)Metastatic bone disease: Clinical features, pathophysiology and treatment strategies Cancer Treatment Reviews 27 165-176
  • [6] Blomqvist C.(1999)Neurochemical and cellular reorganization of the spinal cord in a murine model of bone cancer pain Journal of Neuroscience 19 10886-10897
  • [7] Beneton M. N.(2004)Bone cancer pain and the role of RANKL/OPG Journal of Musculoskeletal Neuronal Interaction 4 293-300
  • [8] Kanis J. A.(2005)Predictive value of bone resorption and formation markers in cancer patients with bone metastases receiving the bisphosphonate zoledronic acid Journal of Clinical Oncology 23 4925-4935
  • [9] Coleman R. E.(1983)Histomorphometric analysis of sclerotic bone metastases from prostatic carcinoma special reference to osteomalacia Cancer 51 918-924
  • [10] Schwei M. J.(1982)Quantitative bone histomorphometry in humoral hypercalcemia of malignancy: Uncoupling of bone cell activity Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 55 219-227