Dipolarization fronts and magnetic flux transport

被引:0
作者
A. T. Y. Lui
机构
[1] JHU/APL,
关键词
Magnetic Flux; Flux Transport; Substorm Current Wedge; Dipolarization Front; Electric Field Magnitude;
D O I
10.1186/s40562-015-0032-1
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Recent emphasis on dipolarization fronts (DFs) has led to the impression that DFs play a significant role in bringing magnetic flux to the inner magnetosphere during substorms. In this work, we investigate the amount of magnetic flux transport associated with DFs by examining the frozen-in field line condition (FIC) for previously reported DF events. A study of 18 DF cases shows that the FIC does not hold for 17 cases when the ratio of Ey+V×ByV×By\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\left| {{{\left[ {E_{y} + \left( {V \times B} \right)_{y} } \right]} \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{\left[ {E_{y} + \left( {V \times B} \right)_{y} } \right]} {\left( {V \times B} \right)_{y} }}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} {\left( {V \times B} \right)_{y} }}} \right|$$\end{document} exceeds 0.5, i.e., the mismatch of Ey and −(V × B)y exceeds 50 %; this criterion is applied only when the electric field magnitude exceeds 0.5 mV/m to eliminate times of low-level electric fluctuations. Furthermore, the peak magnetic flux transport rate for DFs in which FIC holds is found to be in the range of ~8–42 kWb/s/RE while the accumulated flux transport within the DF intervals to be ~0.1–2.8 MWb/RE. Assuming a dawn-dusk dimension of 3 RE for a DF, the accumulated magnetic flux transport is ~0.3–8 MWb, which amounts to ~0.1–2.2 % of what is needed to account for magnetic flux increase in the near-earth dipolarization during substorms. This result casts doubt on the idea that DFs play a significant role in substorm dipolarization.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 41 条
  • [1] Angelopoulos V(2008)The THEMIS mission Space Sci Rev 141 453-476
  • [2] Angelopoulos V(1992)Bursty bulk flow in the inner central plasma sheet J Geophys Res 97 4027-4039
  • [3] Angelopoulos V(1994)Statistical characteristics of bursty bulk flow events J Geophys Res 99 21257-21280
  • [4] Angelopoulos V(2013)Electromagnetic energy conversion at reconnection fronts Science 341 1478-1482
  • [5] Auster HU(2008)The THEMIS fluxgate magnetometer Space Sci Rev 141 235-264
  • [6] Bonnell JW(2008)The electric field instrument (EFI) for THEMIS Space Sci Rev 141 303-341
  • [7] Chen LJ(2000)Kinetic properties of bursty bulk flow events Geophys Res Lett 27 1847-1850
  • [8] Cao J(2013)Kinetic analysis of the energy transport of bursty bulk flows in the plasma sheet J Geophys Res 18 389-392
  • [9] Jacquey C(1991)Location and propagation of the magnetotail current disruption during substorm expansion: analysis and simulation of an ISEE multi-onset event Geophys Res Lett 116 A00I29-2020
  • [10] Sauvaud JA(2011)Superposed epoch analysis of magnetotail flux transport observed by THEMIS J Geophy Res. 118 2000-926