Surgical suturing training with virtual reality simulation versus dry lab practice: an evaluation of performance improvement, content, and face validity

被引:21
作者
Amirian M.J. [1 ]
Lindner S.M. [1 ]
Trabulsi E.J. [1 ,2 ]
Lallas C.D. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Department of Urology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, 1015 Walnut Street, Suite 1100, Philadelphia, 19107, PA
[2] Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, 1015 Walnut Street, Suite 1100, Philadelphia
关键词
Simulation; Surgical training; Validation; Virtual reality;
D O I
10.1007/s11701-014-0475-y
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of virtual reality (VR) simulation versus dry lab suturing practice at improving suturing performance in robotic surgery. Nineteen novice participants with no prior robotic suturing experience were randomized to two groups, VR simulation and dry lab, which consisted of inanimate training on a da Vinci Si surgical system. Each group underwent baseline suturing evaluation, then trained on the Simbionix™ Suturing Module (SSM) or undertook suturing practice using the da Vinci Surgical System in a dry lab. Final suturing performance was evaluated using the objective suture scoring method. Participants in the VR simulation group were surveyed to assess the face and content validity of the SSM. Both groups experienced significant improvement after training (VR simulation group p = 0.0078; dry lab group p = 0.0039). There was no significant difference in improvement between the two groups after undergoing training with either SSM or in the dry lab. Improvements in composite timing scores were 123 and 172 in the VR simulation and dry lab test groups, respectively (p = 0.36). Face validation varied with respect to the category assessed, but participants confirmed content validity of the SSM in all categories. In this sample of novice operators, there was no significant advantage in training with VR simulation using the SSM over dry lab training in improving suturing performance. Users of the SSM found it useful and relevant as a training tool for improving suturing performance. © 2014, Springer-Verlag London.
引用
收藏
页码:329 / 335
页数:6
相关论文
共 12 条
[1]  
Raman J.D., Dong S., Levinson A., Et al., Robotic radical prostatectomy: operative technique, outcomes, and learning curve, JSLS, 11, (2007)
[2]  
Ou Y.C., Yang C.R., Wang J., Et al., The learning curve for reducing complications of robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy by a single surgeon, BJU Int, 108, 3, pp. 420-425, (2011)
[3]  
Steinberg P.L., Merguerian P.A., Bihrle W., Et al., The cost of learning robotic-assisted prostatectomy, Urology, 72, pp. 1068-1072, (2008)
[4]  
Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons. Accessed 27 Sep 2013
[5]  
Arikatla V.S., Ahn W., Sankaranarayanan G., De S., Towards virtual FLS: development of a peg transfer simulator. Int J Med Robot, doi:10.1002/rcs.1534, (2013)
[6]  
Stegemann A.P., Ahmed K., Syed J.R., Et al., Fundamental skills of robotic surgery: a multi-institutional randomized controlled trial for validation of a simulation-based curriculum, Urology, 81, 4, pp. 767-774, (2013)
[7]  
Kelly D.C., Margules A.C., Kundavaram C.R., Et al., Face, content, and construct validation of the da Vinci Skills Simulator, Urology, 79, 5, pp. 1068-1072, (2012)
[8]  
Lerner M.A., Ayalew M., Peine W.J., Sundaram C.P., Does training on a virtual reality robotic simulator improve performance on the da Vinci surgical system?, J Endourol, 24, 3, pp. 467-472, (2010)
[9]  
Derossis A.M., Fried G.M., Abrahamowicz M., Et al., Development of a model for training and evaluation of laparoscopic skills, Am J Surg, 175, 6, pp. 482-487, (1998)
[10]  
Ritter E.M., Scott D.J., Design of a proficiency-based skills training curriculum for the fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery, Surg Innov, 14, 2, pp. 107-112, (2007)