Construction of a questionnaire measuring outpatients' opinion of quality of hospital consultation departments

被引：47
作者：
Gasquet I. [1 ,2 ]
Villeminot S. [2 ]
Estaquio C. [2 ]
Durieux P. [3 ]
Ravaud P. [1 ,4 ]
Falissard B. [2 ]
机构：
[1] Hôpitaux de Paris, 75184 Paris Cedex
[2] UPRES JE 2360, PSIGIM, Paul Brousse Hospital, Villejuif
[3] Dept. of Pub. Hlth./Med. Informatics, Faculte de Med. Broussais Hotel Dieu, Paris
[4] Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Clinical Research, Hôpitaux de Paris, 75184 Paris Cedex
来源：
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes | / 2卷 / 1期
关键词：
Consultation; Hospital; Patient satisfaction; Psychometrics; Quality of care;
D O I：
10.1186/1477-7525-2-43
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
Background: Few questionnaires on outpatients' satisfaction with hospital exist. All have been constructed without giving enough room for the patient's point of view in the validation procedure. The main objective was to develop, according to psychometric standards, a self-administered generic outpatient questionnaire exploring opinion on quality of hospital care. Method: First, a qualitative phase was conducted to generate items and identify domains using critical analysis incident technique and literature review. A list of easily comprehensible non-redundant items was defined using Delphi technique and a pilot study on outpatients. This phase involved outpatients, patient association representatives and experts. The second step was a quantitative validation phase comprised a multicenter study in 3 hospitals, 10 departments and 1007 outpatients. It was designed to select items, identify dimensions, measure reliability, internal and concurrent validity. Patients were randomized according to the place of questionnaire completion (hospital v. home) (participation rate = 65%). Third, a mail-back study on 2 departments and 248 outpatients was conducted to replicate the validation (participation rate = 57%). Results: A 27-item questionnaire comprising 4 subscales (appointment making, reception facilities, waiting time and consultation with the doctor). The factorial structure was satisfactory (loading >0.50 on each subscale for all items, except one item). Interscale correlations ranged from 0.42 to 0.59, Cronbach α coefficients ranged from 0.79 to 0.94. All Item-scale correlations were higher than 0.40. Test-retest intraclass coefficients ranged from 0.69 to 0.85. A unidimensional 9-item version was produced by selection of one third of the items within each subscale with the strongest loading on the principal component and the best item-scale correlation corrected for overlap. Factors related to satisfaction level independent from departments were age, previous consultations in the department and satisfaction with life. Completion at hospital immediately after consultation led to an overestimation of satisfaction. No satisfaction score differences existed between spontaneous respondents and patients responding after reminder(s). Conclusion: Good estimation of patient opinion on hospital consultation performance was obtained with these questionnaires. When comparing performances between departments or the same department over time scores need to be adjusted on 3 variables that influence satisfaction independently from department. Completion of the questionnaire at home is preferable to completion in the consultation facility and reminders are not necessary to produce non-biased data. © 2004 Gasquet et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
引用
收藏
页数：13
相关论文
共 52 条
  • [1] Donabedian A., The quality of care. How can it be assessed?, Jama, 260, pp. 1743-1748, (1988)
  • [2] Cleary P.D., Edgman-Levitan S., Health care quality. Incorporating consumer perspectives, Jama, 278, pp. 1608-1612, (1997)
  • [3] Deyo R.A., Inui T.S., Dropouts and broken appointments. A literature review and agenda for future research, Med. Care, 18, pp. 1146-1157, (1980)
  • [4] Williams B., Patient satisfaction: A valid concept?, Soc. Sci. Med., 38, pp. 509-516, (1994)
  • [5] Ware Jr. J.E., Snyder M.K., Wright W.R., Davies A.R., Defining and measuring patient satisfaction with medical care, Eval. Program Plann, 6, pp. 247-263, (1983)
  • [6] Asadi-Lari M., Tamburini M., Gray D., Patients' needs, satisfaction, and health related quality of life: Towards a comprehensive model, Health Qual. Life Outcomes, 2, (2004)
  • [7] Sitzia J., Wood N., Patient satisfaction: A review of issues and concepts, Soc. Sci. Med., 45, pp. 1829-1843, (1997)
  • [8] Labarere J., Francois P., Auquier P., Robert C., Fourny M., Development of a French inpatient satisfaction questionnaire, Int. J. Qual. Health Care, 13, pp. 99-108, (2001)
  • [9] Gasquet I., Falissard B., Ravaud P., Impact of reminders and method of questionnaire distribution on patient response to mail-back satisfaction survey, J. Clin. Epidemiol., 54, pp. 1174-1180, (2001)
  • [10] Salomon L., Gasquet I., Mesbah M., Ravaud P., Construction of a scale measuring inpatients' opinion on quality of care, Int. J. Qual. Health Care, 11, pp. 507-516, (1999)
123456