Mapping clinical reasoning literature across the health professions: a scoping review

被引：0
作者：
Meredith E. Young
Aliki Thomas
Stuart Lubarsky
David Gordon
Larry D. Gruppen
Joseph Rencic
Tiffany Ballard
Eric Holmboe
Ana Da Silva
Temple Ratcliffe
Lambert Schuwirth
Valérie Dory
Steven J. Durning
机构：
[1] McGill University,Institute of Health Sciences Education in the Faculty of Medicine
[2] School of Physical and Occupational Therapy,Department of Neurology and Institute of Health Sciences Education
[3] Institute of Health Sciences Education in the Faculty of Medicine at McGill University,Division of Emergency Medicine and the Department of Surgery
[4] Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation of greater Montreal,Department of Learning Health Sciences
[5] McGill University,Division of General Internal Medicine at Tufts Medical Center
[6] Duke University School of Medicine,Chief Research, Milestone Development, and Evaluation Officer
[7] University of Michigan Medical School,Department of Medicine
[8] Tufts University School of Medicine,Department of Medicine, an Assessment Specialist for undergraduate medical education in the Faculty of Medicine
[9] University of Michigan,Department of Medicine
[10] ACGME,undefined
[11] Feinberg School of Medicine of Northwestern University,undefined
[12] Swansea University Medical School,undefined
[13] University of Texas Health Science Center,undefined
[14] Flinders University,undefined
[15] Maastricht University,undefined
[16] Chang Gung University,undefined
[17] Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences,undefined
[18] McGill University,undefined
[19] Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences,undefined
来源：
BMC Medical Education | / 20卷
关键词：
Clinical reasoning; Health professions; Synthesis; Scoping review; Teaching; Assessment; Education;
D O I：
暂无
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 69 条
[11]  
Nabors SG(2013)Clarifying assumptions to enhance our understanding and assessment of clinical reasoning Acad Med 88 442-166
[12]  
Olson A(2018)How different theories of clinical reasoning influence teaching and assessment Acad Med 93 1415-32
[13]  
Barrows HS(2013)Interprofessional education: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes (update) Cochrane Database Syst Rev 3 161-912
[14]  
Norman GR(2017)Knowledge syntheses in medical education: demystifying scoping reviews Acad Med 92 19-995
[15]  
Neufeld VR(2005)Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework Int J Soc Res Methodol 8 902-1014
[16]  
Feightner JW(2019)Clinical reasoning assessment methods: a scoping review and practical guidance Acad Med 94 990-3
[17]  
Barrows HS(2018)Drawing boundaries: the difficulty in defining clinical reasoning Acad Med 93 1007-2
[18]  
Feltovich PJ(2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement PLoS Med 6 1-238
[19]  
Neufeld VR(1991)The therapist with the three-track mind Am J Occup Ther 45 1-undefined
[20]  
Norman GR(2018)Crystallizations of constructs: lessons learned from a literature review Pers Med Educ 27 225-undefined
1234567