Verfahren zur Präferenzmessung - Eine Übersicht und Beurteilung existierender undmöglicher neuer Self-Explicated-Verfahren

被引:0
作者
Eckert J. [1 ]
Schaaf R. [2 ]
机构
[1] School of Marketing, Faculty of Business, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2007, City Campus
[2] Professur für Betriebswirtschaftslehre, Insbesondere Electronic Commerce, Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main, 60323 Frankfurt am Main, Grüneburgplatz 1, RuW Gebäude
来源
Journal für Betriebswirtschaft | 2009年 / 59卷 / 1期
关键词
Importance measurement; Preference measurement; Self-explicated-approaches;
D O I
10.1007/s11301-009-0046-x
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
It is essential for companies that offered products meet consumer preferences to ensure the corporate performance in the long term. Besides Conjoint Approaches, Self-Explicated-Approaches are the most common approaches to determine consumer preferences. Surprisingly, despite the relevance of Self-Explicated-Approaches existing research has mainly focused on decompositional preference measurement approaches. The article provides an overview of all existing Self-Explicated-Approaches and shows that only a few have been implemented so far and identifies most promising new Self-Explicated-Approaches for future research. Besides an evaluation of Self-Explicated-Approaches based on accuracy criteria we also take application-oriented criteria into account in order to illustrate most appropriate Self-Explicated-Approaches for business applications. © Wirtschaftsuniversität Wien, Austria 2009.
引用
收藏
页码:31 / 56
页数:25
相关论文
共 74 条
[1]  
Agarwal M.K., Green P.E., Adaptive conjoint analysis versus self explicated models, some empirical results, Int J Res Market, 8, pp. 141-146, (1991)
[2]  
Aggarwal P., Vaidyanathan R., Eliciting online consumers' preferences: Conjoint vs self-explicated attribute-level measurements, J Market Manag, 19, pp. 157-177, (2003)
[3]  
Akaah I., Korgaonkar P.K., An empirical comparison of the predictive validity of self-explicated, huber-hybrid, traditional conjoint and hybrid conjoint models, J Market Res, 20, pp. 187-197, (1983)
[4]  
Alwin D.F., Krosnick J.A., The measurement of values in surveys: A comparison of ratings and rankings, Pub Opin Q, 49, pp. 535-552, (1985)
[5]  
Brockhoff K., Produktpolitik, (1999)
[6]  
Brown T.C., Peterson R.M., Broderson V., Ford V., Bell P.A., The judged seriousness of an environmental loss is a matter of what caused it, J Environ Psychol, 25, pp. 13-21, (2005)
[7]  
Chrzan K., Golovashkina N., An empirical test of six stated importance measures, Int J Market Res, 48, pp. 717-740, (2006)
[8]  
Churchill G.A., Iacobucci D., Marketing Research: Methodological Foundations, (2002)
[9]  
Cohen S., Maximum difference scaling: Improved measures of importance and preference for segmentation, Proceedings of the 2003 Sawtooth Software Conference, pp. 61-74, (2003)
[10]  
Comrey A.L., A proposed method for absolute ratio scaling, Psychometrika, 15, pp. 317-325, (1950)