Sustainable Power Generation in Europe: A Panel Data Analysis of the Effects of Market and Environmental Regulations

被引:0
作者
Simona Bigerna
Maria Chiara D’Errico
Paolo Polinori
机构
[1] University of Perugia,Department of Economics
来源
Environmental and Resource Economics | 2022年 / 83卷
关键词
Electricity industry; Regulation stringency; Malmquist Luenberger index; Bayesian shrinkage estimator; C21; L51; L94; O47; Q58;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Climate change and greenhouse gas emissions have become increasingly more pressing environmental concerns in European policy agenda. Environmental energy efficiency (EEE) has been identified as one of the main tools for fostering the sustainable energy transition. The current policy debate on the organization of energy markets focuses both on promoting higher market efficiency and environmentally sustainable production. Consequently, in this study we analyze the impact of market and environmental regulatory tools on EEE for the electricity sector of European countries using an innovative econometric technique. We conduct an empirical analysis of the dynamics of the technical and environmental performance of the electricity sectors of 18 EU countries during 2006–2014. The contribution of the present study to the literature is threefold. First, we propose a redefinition of the technology set and a new index for the productivity change feasible and consistent with the presence of bad output. Second, we decompose the productivity changes in the two main components (the efficiency gains and the technological progress), and we measure the co-joint effects of the stringency of both market and environmental policies on these two main drivers of EEE. Third, we model country heterogeneity using a Bayesian shrinkage estimator to avoid the estimates’ poolability assumption. Results suggest that the dynamic of the effects of regulations on EEE depend on the policy instrument used. Finally, the country-specific results highlight the effects of the interactions among different policy instruments and they can be used by policy makers to balance the stringency of market regulation according to the level of environmental regulation.
引用
收藏
页码:445 / 479
页数:34
相关论文
共 135 条
[11]  
Pastor JT(2020)Heterogeneous impacts of regulatory policy stringency on the EU electricity industry: a Bayesian shrinkage dynamic analysis Energy Policy 142 111522-298
[12]  
Zofio JL(2000)BACON: blocked adaptive computationally efficient outlier nominators Comput Stat Data Anal 34 279-437
[13]  
Aparicio J(2015)EU ETS, free allocations and activity level thresholds: the devil lies in the details J Assoc Environ Resour Econ 2 401-67
[14]  
Barbero J(2016)Measuring environmental regulatory stringency Rev Environ Econ Policy 10 47-419
[15]  
Kapelko M(1996)Benefit and distance functions J Econ Theory 70 407-364
[16]  
Pastor JT(1998)Profit, directional distance functions, and Nerlovian efficiency J Opt Theory Appl 98 351-35
[17]  
Zofío JL(2003)A non-radial Malmquist productivity index with an illustrative application to Chinese major industries Int J Prod Econ 83 27-240
[18]  
Arellano M(1997)Productivity and undesirable outputs: a directional distance function approach J Environ Manag 51 229-376
[19]  
Bond S(2018)One size does not fit all... panel data: Bayesian model averaging and data poolability Econ Model 75 364-538
[20]  
Baltagi BH(2009)A comment on weak disposability in nonparametric production analysis Am J Agric Econ 91 535-122