Effect of Business Education on Women and Men Students’ Attitudes on Corporate Responsibility in Society

被引:0
作者
Anna-Maija Lämsä
Meri Vehkaperä
Tuomas Puttonen
Hanna-Leena Pesonen
机构
[1] University of Jyväskylä,School of Business and Economics
来源
Journal of Business Ethics | 2008年 / 82卷
关键词
attitude; responsibility; business; corporate social responsibility; gender; business education; socialization; Finland;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This article describes a survey among Finnish business students to find answers to the following questions: How do business students define a well-run company? What are their attitudes on the responsibilities of business in society? Do the attitudes of women students differ from those of men? What is the influence of business education on these attitudes? Our sample comprised 217 students pursuing a master’s degree in business studies at two Finnish universities. The results show that, as a whole, students valued the stakeholder model of the company more than the shareholder model. However, attitudes differed according to gender: women students were more in favor of the stakeholder model and placed more weight on corporate ethical, environmental, and societal responsibilities than their men counterparts – both at the beginning and at the end of their studies. Thus, no gender socialization effect of business school education could be observed in this sense. Business school education was found to shape women and men students’ attitudes in two ways. Firstly, valuation of the shareholder model increased and, secondly, the importance of equal-opportunity employment decreased in the course of education. This raises the question whether the educational context is creating an undesirable tendency among future business professionals. The results further suggest that the sociocultural context can make a difference in how corporate social responsibility is perceived. The article also discusses possible ways to influence the attitudes of business students.
引用
收藏
页码:45 / 58
页数:13
相关论文
共 67 条
[1]  
Baetz M. C.(2004)Integrating Ethics Content into the Core of Business Curriculum: Do Core Teaching Materials Do the Job? Journal of Business Ethics 51 53-63
[2]  
Sharp D. J.(1998)Business Students and Ethics: A Meta-Analysis Journal of Business Ethics 17 1117-1127
[3]  
Borkowski S. C.(1979)A Three-Dimensional Conceptual Model of Corporate Social Performance Academy of Management Review 4 497-505
[4]  
Ugras Y. J.(1991)The Pyramid of Corporate Social Responsibility: Toward the Moral Management of Organizational Stakeholders Business Horizons 34 39-48
[5]  
Carroll A. B(1999)Corporate Social Responsibility. Evolution of a Definitional Construct Business & Society 38 268-295
[6]  
Carroll A. B.(1989)An Empirical Study of Moral Reasoning Journal of Business Ethics 8 855-862
[7]  
Carroll A. B.(2000)Perceptions of Proper Ethical Conduct of Male and Female Russian Managers Journal of Business Ethics 24 179-183
[8]  
Derry R.(1999)Are Business Managers “Professionals” Business Ethics Quarterly 10 83-94
[9]  
Deshpande S. P.(1995)The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concepts, Evidence and Implications Academy of Management Review 20 65-91
[10]  
Joseph J.(2004)An Examination of Business Students’ Perception of Corporate Social Responsibilities Before and After Bankruptcies Journal of Business Ethics 52 267-281