Probability weighting for losses and for gains among smallholder farmers in Uganda

被引:0
|
作者
Arjan Verschoor
Ben D’Exelle
机构
[1] University of East Anglia,School of International Development
来源
Theory and Decision | 2022年 / 92卷
关键词
Cumulative prospect theory; Probability weighting; Losses; Gains; Uganda;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Probability weighting is a marked feature of decision-making under risk. For poor people in rural areas of developing countries, how probabilities are evaluated matters for livelihoods decisions, especially the probabilities associated with losses. Previous studies of risky choice among poor people in developing countries seldom consider losses and do not offer a refined tracking of the probability-weighting function (PWF). We investigate probability weighting among smallholder farmers in Uganda, separately for losses and for gains, using a method (common consequence ladders) that allows refined tracking of the PWF for a population with low levels of literacy. For losses, we find marked probability weighting near zero, which is in line with evidence found in Western labs. For gains, the absence of probability weighting is remarkable, particularly its absence near 100%. We also find marked differences in probability weighting for traditional farmers which are in line with the observed livelihoods strategies in the study area.
引用
收藏
页码:223 / 258
页数:35
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Access to veterinary services and expenditure on pig health management: the case of smallholder pig farmers in Northern Uganda
    Daniel Micheal Okello
    Walter Odongo
    Tonny Aliro
    Elly Kurobuza Ndyomugyenyi
    Tropical Animal Health and Production, 2020, 52 : 3735 - 3744
  • [32] Access to veterinary services and expenditure on pig health management: the case of smallholder pig farmers in Northern Uganda
    Okello, Daniel Micheal
    Odongo, Walter
    Aliro, Tonny
    Ndyomugyenyi, Elly Kurobuza
    TROPICAL ANIMAL HEALTH AND PRODUCTION, 2020, 52 (06) : 3735 - 3744
  • [33] Are smallholder farmers willing to pay for a flexible balloon biogas digester? Evidence from a case study in Uganda
    Kabyanga, Moris
    Balana, Bedru B.
    Mugisha, Johnny
    Walekhwa, Peter N.
    Smith, Jo
    Glenk, Klaus
    ENERGY FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2018, 43 : 123 - 129
  • [34] Determinants of smallholder barley farmers' intentions to adopt blockchain technology: a Technology Acceptance Model approach in Uganda
    Ninsiima, Racheal
    Mshenga, Patience
    Okello, Dickson
    FRONTIERS IN SUSTAINABLE FOOD SYSTEMS, 2025, 9
  • [35] The wellbeing of smallholder coffee farmers in the Mount Elgon region: a quantitative analysis of a rural community in Eastern Uganda
    Bartl, Anna Lina
    BIO-BASED AND APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2019, 8 (02): : 133 - 159
  • [36] Food Standards, Certification, and Poverty among Coffee Farmers in Uganda
    Chiputwa, Brian
    Spielman, David J.
    Qaim, Matin
    WORLD DEVELOPMENT, 2015, 66 : 400 - 412
  • [37] Knowledge, Attitude, and Practices on Tomato Leaf Miner, Tuta absoluta on Tomato and Potential Demand for Integrated Pest Management among Smallholder Farmers in Kenya and Uganda
    Chepchirchir, Fridah
    Muriithi, Beatrice W.
    Langat, Jackson
    Mohamed, Samira A.
    Ndlela, Shepard
    Khamis, Fathiya M.
    AGRICULTURE-BASEL, 2021, 11 (12):
  • [38] Enhancing knowledge and awareness of biosecurity practices for control of African swine fever among smallholder pig farmers in four districts along the Kenya–Uganda border
    Noelina Nantima
    Jocelyn Davies
    Michel Dione
    Michael Ocaido
    Edward Okoth
    Anthony Mugisha
    Richard Bishop
    Tropical Animal Health and Production, 2016, 48 : 727 - 734
  • [39] Risk Attitudes of Children and Adults: Choices Over Small and Large Probability Gains and Losses
    Harbaugh, William T.
    Krause, Kate
    Vesterlund, Lise
    EXPERIMENTAL ECONOMICS, 2002, 5 (01) : 53 - 84
  • [40] Risk Attitudes of Children and Adults: Choices Over Small and Large Probability Gains and Losses
    William T. Harbaugh
    Kate Krause
    Lise Vesterlund
    Experimental Economics, 2002, 5 : 53 - 84