A risk-based multi-level stress test methodology: application to six critical non-nuclear infrastructures in Europe

被引:0
作者
Sotirios A. Argyroudis
Stavroula Fotopoulou
Stella Karafagka
Kyriazis Pitilakis
Jacopo Selva
Ernesto Salzano
Anna Basco
Helen Crowley
Daniela Rodrigues
José P. Matos
Anton J. Schleiss
Wim Courage
Johan Reinders
Yin Cheng
Sinan Akkar
Eren Uçkan
Mustafa Erdik
Domenico Giardini
Arnaud Mignan
机构
[1] Aristotle University,Department of Civil Engineering
[2] Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV),Department of Civil, Chemical, Environmental and Materials Engineering
[3] Sezione di Bologna,Civil Engineering Institute
[4] University of Bologna,School of Civil Engineering
[5] University of Napoli Federico II,Kandilli Observatory and Earthquake Research Institute
[6] EUCENTRE,Department of Earth Sciences, Institute of Geophysics
[7] EPFL,Institute of Risk Analysis, Prediction and Management, Academy for Advanced Interdisciplinary Studies
[8] TNO,undefined
[9] SGS,undefined
[10] Southwest Jiaotong University,undefined
[11] Bogazici University,undefined
[12] ETH Zürich,undefined
[13] Southern University of Science and Technology,undefined
来源
Natural Hazards | 2020年 / 100卷
关键词
Critical infrastructure; Stress test; Risk assessment; Natural hazards; Earthquake; Tsunami; Liquefaction; Multi-hazard; Resilience;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Recent natural disasters that seriously affected critical infrastructure (CI) with significant socio-economic losses and impact revealed the need for the development of reliable methodologies for vulnerability and risk assessment. In this paper, a risk-based multi-level stress test method that has been recently proposed, aimed at enhancing procedures for evaluation of the risk of critical non-nuclear infrastructure systems against natural hazards, is specified and applied to six key representative CIs in Europe, exposed to variant hazards. The following CIs are considered: an oil refinery and petrochemical plant in Milazzo, Italy, a conceptual alpine earth-fill dam in Switzerland, the Baku–Tbilisi–Ceyhan pipeline in Turkey, part of the Gasunie national gas storage and distribution network in the Netherlands, the port infrastructure of Thessaloniki, Greece, and an industrial district in the region of Tuscany, Italy. The six case studies are presented following the workflow of the stress test framework comprised of four phases: pre-assessment phase, assessment phase, decision phase and report phase. First, the goals, the method, the time frame and the appropriate stress test level to apply are defined. Then, the stress test is performed at component and system levels and the outcomes are checked and compared to risk acceptance criteria. A stress test grade is assigned, and the global outcome is determined by employing a grading system. Finally, critical components and events and risk mitigation strategies are formulated and reported to stakeholders and authorities.
引用
收藏
页码:595 / 633
页数:38
相关论文
共 176 条
  • [1] Akkar S(2010)Empirical equations for the prediction of PGA, PGV and spectral accelerations in Europe, the Mediterranean and the Middle East Seismol Res Lett 81 195-206
  • [2] Bommer JJ(2014)Empirical ground-motion models for point-and extended-source crustal earthquake scenarios in Europe and the Middle East Bull Earthq Eng 12 359-387
  • [3] Akkar S(2014)Erratum to: empirical ground-motion models for point- and extended-source crustal earthquake scenarios in Europe and the Middle East Bull Earthq Eng 12 389-390
  • [4] Sandıkkaya MA(2019)Fragility of transport assets exposed to multiple hazards: State-of-the-art review toward infrastructural resilience Reliab Eng Syst Saf 191 106567-370
  • [5] Bommer JJ(2016)Seismic fragility functions of industrial precast building classes Eng Struct 118 357-65
  • [6] Akkar S(2016)The vulnerability of industrial equipment to tsunami J Loss Prevent Proc 8 53-620
  • [7] Sandıkkaya MA(2000)Disasters and transport systems: loss, recovery, and competition at the Port of Kobe after the 1995 earthquake J Transp Geogr 46 605-1055
  • [8] Bommer JJ(2017)Probabilistic permanent fault displacement hazard via Monte Carlo simulation and its consideration for the probabilistic risk assessment of buried continuous steel pipelines Earthq Eng Struct D 33 1041-1198
  • [9] Argyroudis S(2015)Simulation-based seismic risk assessment of a gas distribution network Comput Aided Civ Inf 55 1158-237
  • [10] Mitoulis SA(2019)A risk-based multi-level methodology to stress test critical non-nuclear infrastructure systems ASCE J Infrastruct Syst 55 227-15