Effect of Winsorization on Power and Type 1 Error of Variance Components and Related Methods of QTL Detection

被引:0
作者
Sanjay Shete
T. Mark Beasley
Carol J. Etzel
José R. Fernández
Jianfang Chen
David B. Allison
Christopher I. Amos
机构
[1] University of Texas,Department of Epidemiology
[2] M. D. Anderson Cancer Center,Department of Biostatistics, Section on Statistical Genetics
[3] The University of Alabama at Birmingham,Department of Nutrition Sciences, Division of Physiology and Metabolism
[4] The University of Alabama at Birmingham,Clinical Nutrition Research Center
[5] The University of Alabama at Birmingham,undefined
来源
Behavior Genetics | 2004年 / 34卷
关键词
Linkage; winsorization; Haseman-Elston; variance components; power; type 1 error;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Variance components analysis provides an efficient method for performing linkage analysis for quantitative traits. However, power and type 1 error of variance components–based likelihood ratio testing may be affected when phenotypic data are nonnormally distributed (especially with high values of kurtosis) and there is moderate to high correlation among the siblings. Winsorization can reduce the effect of outliers on statistical analyses. Here, we considered the effect of winsorization on variance components–based tests. We considered the likelihood ratio test (LRT), the Wald test, and some robust variance components tests. We compared these tests with Haseman-Elston least squares–based tests. We found that power to detect linkage is significantly increased after winsorization of the nonnormal phenotypes. Winsorization does not greatly diminish the type 1 error for the variance components–based tests for markedly nonnormal data. A robust version of the LRT that adjusts for sample kurtosis showed the best power for nonnormal data. Finally, phenotype winsorization of nonnormal data reduces the bias in estimation of the major gene variance component.
引用
收藏
页码:153 / 159
页数:6
相关论文
共 67 条
[1]  
Allison D. B.(1999)Testing the robustness of the likelihood ratio test in a variance-component quantitative-trait loci-mapping procedure Am. J. Hum. Genet. 65 531-544
[2]  
Neale M. C.(2000)Testing the robustness of the New Haseman-Elston Quantitative Trait Loci (QTL) Mapping Procedure Am. J. Hum. Genet. 67 249-252
[3]  
Zannolli R.(2002)Bias in estimates of quantitative-trait-locus effect in genome scans: Demonstration of the phenomenon and a method-of-moments procedure for reducing bias Am. J. Hum. Genet. 70 575-585
[4]  
Schork N. J.(1998)Multipoint quantitative-trait linkage analysis in general pedigrees Am. J. Hum. Genet. 62 1198-1211
[5]  
Amos C. I.(1994)Robust variance-components approach for assessing genetic linkage in pedigrees Am. J. Hum. Genet. 54 535-543
[6]  
Blangero J.(1996)Assessing genetic linkage and association with robust components of variance approaches Ann. Hum. Genet. 60 143-160
[7]  
Allison D. B.(1982)Power and robustness of sib-pair linkage tests and extension to larger sibships Commun. Stat. Theor. Methods 11 449-484
[8]  
Fernández J. R.(1997)Multipoint oligogenic linkage analysis of quantitative traits Genet. Epidemiol. 14 959-964
[9]  
Heo M.(2000)Robust LOD scores for variance components-based linkage analysis Genet. Epidemiol. 19 S8-S14
[10]  
Beasley M. T.(2000)Haseman and Elston revisited Genet. Epidemiol. 19 1-17