A visual quality control scale for clinical arterial spin labeling images

被引:5
作者
Fallatah S.M. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Pizzini F.B. [4 ]
Gomez-Anson B. [5 ]
Magerkurth J. [1 ]
De Vita E. [1 ,2 ]
Bisdas S. [1 ,2 ]
Jäger H.R. [1 ,2 ]
Mutsaerts H.J.M.M. [6 ,7 ,8 ]
Golay X. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Department of Brain Repair and Rehabilitation, UCL Institute of Neurology, London
[2] The National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London
[3] Radiology Department, King Abdualaziz Medical City, Riyadh
[4] Neuroradiology, University Hospital of Verona, Piazzale Stefani 1, Verona
[5] Unitat Neuroradiologia, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, IIB-Sant Pau, Universitat Autonoma, Barcelona
[6] Radiology Department, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam
[7] Radiology Department, Vrije Universiteit University Medical Center, Amsterdam
[8] Radiology Department, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht
关键词
Arterial spin labelling; Magnetic resonance imaging; Perfusion imaging; Quality control;
D O I
10.1186/s41747-018-0073-2
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Image-quality assessment is a fundamental step before clinical evaluation of magnetic resonance images. The aim of this study was to introduce a visual scoring system that provides a quality control standard for arterial spin labeling (ASL) and that can be applied to cerebral blood flow (CBF) maps, as well as to ancillary ASL images. Methods: The proposed image quality control (QC) system had two components: (1) contrast-based QC (cQC), describing the visual contrast between anatomical structures; and (2) artifact-based QC (aQC), evaluating image quality of the CBF map for the presence of common types of artifacts. Three raters evaluated cQC and aQC for 158 quantitative signal targeting with alternating radiofrequency labelling of arterial regions (QUASAR) ASL scans (CBF, T1 relaxation rate, arterial blood volume, and arterial transient time). Spearman correlation coefficient (r), intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), and receiver operating characteristic analysis were used. Results: Intra/inter-rater agreement ranged from moderate to excellent; inter-rater ICC was 0.72 for cQC, 0.60 for aQC, and 0.74 for the combined QC (cQC + aQC). Intra-rater ICC was 0.90 for cQC; 0.80 for aQC, and 0.90 for the combined QC. Strong correlations were found between aQC and CBF maps quality (r = 0.75), and between aQC and cQC (r = 0.70). A QC score of 18 was optimal to discriminate between high and low quality clinical scans. Conclusions: The proposed QC system provided high reproducibility and a reliable threshold for discarding low quality scans. Future research should compare this visual QC system with an automatic QC system. © 2018, The Author(s).
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]  
Alsop D.C., Detre J.A., Golay X., Et al., Recommended implementation of arterial spin-labeled perfusion MRI for clinical applications: a consensus of the ISMRM perfusion study group and the European Consortium for ASL in dementia, Magn Reson Med, 73, pp. 102-116, (2014)
[2]  
Borogovac A., Asllani I., Arterial spin labeling (ASL) fMRI: advantages, theoretical constrains and experimental challenges in neurosciences, Int J Biomed Imaging, 2012, (2012)
[3]  
Hendrikse J., Petersen E.T., Golay X., Vascular disorders: insights from arterial spin labeling, Neuroimaging Clin N Am, 22, pp. 259-269, (2012)
[4]  
Alsop D.C., Dai W., Grossman M., Detre J.A., Arterial spin labeling blood flow MRI: its role in the early characterization of Alzheimer’s disease, J Alzheimers Dis, 20, pp. 871-880, (2010)
[5]  
Wang D.J., Chen Y., Fernandez-Seara M.A., Detre J.A., Potentials and challenges for arterial spin labeling in pharmacological magnetic resonance imaging, J Pharmacol Exp Ther, 337, pp. 359-366, (2011)
[6]  
Detre J.A., Rao H., Wang D.J., Chen Y.F., Wang Z., Applications of arterial spin labeled MRI in the brain, J Magn Reson Imaging, 35, pp. 1026-1037, (2012)
[7]  
Alsop D.C., Detre J.A., Reduced transit-time sensitivity in noninvasive magnetic resonance imaging of human cerebral blood flow, J Cereb Blood Flow Metab, 16, pp. 1236-1249, (1996)
[8]  
Fernandez-Seara M., Edlow B.L., Hoang A., Wang J., Feinberg D.A., Detre J.A., Minimizing acquisition time of arterial spin labeling at 3T, Magn Reson Med, 59, pp. 1467-1471, (2008)
[9]  
Petersen E.T., Mouridsen K., Golay X., The QUASAR reproducibility study, Part II: results from a multi-center Arterial Spin Labeling test-retest study, Neuroimage, 49, pp. 104-113, (2010)
[10]  
Mutsaertszelaya H.O.M.J., Et al., Multi-vendor reliability of arterial spin labeling perfusion MRI using a near-identical sequence: Implications for multi-center studies, Neuroimage, 113, pp. 143-152, (2015)