International Bureaucracies as Strategic Actors: How the Better Regulation Reform Strengthens the European Commission; [Internationale Verwaltungen als strategische Akteure: Wie die Reform für bessere Rechtssetzung die Europäische Kommission stärkt]

被引:0
作者
Jankauskas V. [1 ,2 ]
Eckhard S. [2 ]
机构
关键词
Bureaucracy; Evaluation; Influence; International organization; International public administration;
D O I
10.1007/s11615-019-00189-3
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The 2015 Better Regulation Reform is recognized as one of the key changes of Juncker’s European Commission, but its political implications remain understudied. Despite its appearance as a seemingly technical evaluation system, we present the reform as a political instrument that enhances the strategic actorness of the Commission, both internally and vis-à-vis the member states. Drawing on primary documents and 16 expert interviews with senior Commission officials, we demonstrate that the Better Regulation Reform enhances the Commission’s ability to act as a unified actor (internal coherence) and contributes to its ability to justify its actions vis-à-vis the member states (external robustness). The article contributes to the literature on international public administration in general and the EU in particular, as it demonstrates how institutional policies may enhance bureaucratic influence. We reveal how an international public administration can conform to member statesʼ demands for more accountability and transparency yet design the overall evaluation system in a way that contributes to its strategic actorness. © 2019, Deutsche Vereinigung für Politikwissenschaft.
引用
收藏
页码:681 / 699
页数:18
相关论文
共 71 条
[41]  
Knill C., Bayerlein L., Enkler J., Grohs S., Bureaucratic influence and administrative styles in international organizations, Review of International Organizations, 14, 1, pp. 83-106, (2019)
[42]  
Knill C., Eckhard S., Bauer M.W., International Public Administration. A new type of bureaucracy, Der moderne staat (dms), 2, pp. 173-189, (2017)
[43]  
Knill C., Eckhard S., Grohs S., Administrative styles in the European Commission and the OSCE Secretariat. Striking similarities despite different organizational settings, Journal of European Public Policy, 23, 7, pp. 1057-1076, (2016)
[44]  
Koronakis A., Juncker on “political” Commission. New Europe, (2019)
[45]  
Lascoumes P., Le Gales P., Introduction: understanding public policy through its instruments? From the nature of instruments to the sociology of public policy instrumentation, Governance, 20, 1, pp. 1-21, (2007)
[46]  
Leeuw F.L., Furubo J.-E., Evaluation systems. What are they and why study them?, Evaluation, 14, 2, pp. 157-169, (2008)
[47]  
Mastenbroek E., van Voorst S., Meuwese A., Closing the regulatory cycle? A meta evaluation of ex-post legislative evaluations by the European Commission, Journal of European Public Policy, 23, 9, pp. 1329-1348, (2016)
[48]  
Merry S.E., Measuring the world. Indicators, human rights, and global governance, Current Anthropology, 52, S3, pp. S83-S95, (2011)
[49]  
Meuwese A., Gomtsian S., Regulatory scrutiny of subsidiarity and proportionality, Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law, 22, 4, pp. 483-505, (2015)
[50]  
Patz R., Goetz K.H., Managing money and discord in the UN. Budgeting and bureaucracy, (2019)