Outcomes Research in Cancer Clinical Trial Cooperative Groups: The RTOG Model

被引:0
作者
D.W. Bruner
B. Movsas
A. Konski
M. Roach
M. Bondy
C. Scarintino
C. Scott
W. Curran
机构
[1] Radiation Therapy Oncology Group,
来源
Quality of Life Research | 2004年 / 13卷
关键词
Clinical trials; Economic analysis; Outcomes research; Quality of life;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG), a National Cancer Institute sponsored cancer clinical trials research cooperative, has recently formed an Outcomes Committee to assess a comprehensive array of clinical trial endpoints and factors impacting the net effect of therapy. Methods: To study outcomes in a consistent, comprehensive and coordinated manner, the RTOG Outcomes Committee developed a model to assess clinical, humanistic, and economic outcomes important in clinical trials. Results: This paper reviews how the RTOG incorporates outcomes research into cancer clinical trials, and demonstrates utilization of the RTOG Outcomes Model to test hypotheses related to non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In this example, the clinical component of the model indicates that the addition of chemotherapy to radiotherapy (RT) improves survival but increases the risk of toxicity. The humanistic component indicates that esophagitis is the symptom impacting quality of life the greatest and may outweigh the benefits in elderly (≥70 years) patients. The economic component of the model indicates that accounting for quality-adjusted survival, concurrent chemoRT for the treatment of NSCLC is within the range of economically acceptable recommendations. Conclusion: The RTOG Outcomes Model guides a comprehensive program of research that systematically measures a triad of endpoints considered important to clinical trials research.
引用
收藏
页码:1025 / 1041
页数:16
相关论文
共 258 条
  • [1] Mandelblatt JS(1995)Historical and methodological perspectives on cancer research Oncology 9 23-32
  • [2] Eisenberg JM.(2000)Outcomes research in oncology: History, conceptual framework, and trends in the literature J Natl Cancer Inst 92 195-204
  • [3] Lee SJ(2000)Origins of health services research Health Serv Res 35 375-387
  • [4] Earle CC(1966)Evaluating the quality of medical care Milbank Mem Fund Q 44 166-206
  • [5] Weeks JC.(1997)Patterns of care studies: Past, present, and future Semin Radiat Oncol 7 97-100
  • [6] McCarthy T(1992)Geographic variation in the use of breast-conserving treatment for breast cancer N Engl J Med 326 1102-1127
  • [7] White KL.(1994)Treatment differences and other prognostic factors related to breast cancer and survival: Delivery systems and medical outcomes J Am Med Assoc 271 1163-1168
  • [8] Donabedian A.(1998)Cost considerations as potential barriers to cancer treatment Cancer Pract 6 182-187
  • [9] Hanks G(2000)Developing theoretical constructs for outcomes research Am J Med Sci 319 245-249
  • [10] Coia L(1985)Food and drug administration requirements for approval of new anticancer drugs Cancer Treat Rep 69 1155-1157