A New Cost-effective Method of NPWT in Diabetic Foot Wound

被引:0
作者
Nikunj Vaidhya
Arpit Panchal
M. M. Anchalia
机构
[1] B. J. Medical College,Department of General Surgery
[2] Ahmedabad,Department of General Surgery
[3] Government Medical College,undefined
来源
Indian Journal of Surgery | 2015年 / 77卷
关键词
Negative-pressure wound therapy; Dressing; Improvised; Cost-effective;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Diabetic foot wounds present a great challenge to surgeons. They are difficult to heal and are a significant risk factor for non-traumatic foot amputation besides being a huge financial burden. NPWT systems commercially available (VAC™ system, KCI Inc., USA) are costly precluding widespread use. To determine whether negative-pressure wound therapy (NPWT) would afford quicker wound recovery as compared to saline-moistened gauze in the treatment of diabetic foot wounds. Sixty patients were randomized into either the experimental NPWT group or conventional dressing group (control). All patients were given medical therapy for diabetes and antibiotics given according to culture and sensitivity patterns. All foot ulcers were surgically debrided prior to initiation of NPWT or conventional treatment. In the NPWT group, dressings were changed every 48–72 h. In the control group, conventional dressings were applied at the time of surgical debridement and changed twice a day thereafter. End point of study was when wound was ready for either skin grafting or secondary suturing. End point was achieved in the NPWT group in 17.2(SD ± 3.55) days, compared to 34.9 (SD ± 5.96) days in the control group (p < 0.001). Number of dressing applied were 7.46(SD ± 2.25) in NPWT group versus 69.8(SD ± 11.93) in conventional dressing group (p < 0.001). Ninety percent cases were successfully treated in NPWT Group as compared to 76.6 % in conventional group. Rate of healing of ulcer is faster in NPWT group as compared to conventional group. Economically modified NPWT is more cost-effective to the patients in our setup.
引用
收藏
页码:525 / 529
页数:4
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]  
Brem H(2006)Evidence based protocol for diabetic foot ulcers Plast Reconstr Surg 117 193S-207S
[2]  
Shehan P(1998)The use and abuse of wound care materials in the treatment of diabetic ulcerations Clin Podiatr Med Surg 15 139-150
[3]  
Rosenberg HJ(2008)The value of debridement and vacuum-assisted closure (V.A.C.) therapy in diabetic foot ulcers Diabetes Metab Res Rev 24 S76-S80
[4]  
Schnieder JS(1997)Vacuum-assisted closure: a new method for wound control and treatment: clinical experience Ann Plast Surg 38 563-576
[5]  
Boulton AJM(1997)Vacuum-assisted closure: a new method for wound control and treatment: animal studies and basic foundation Ann Plast Surg 38 553-562
[6]  
Day MR(2010)Wound edge microvascular blood flow during negative-pressure wound therapy: examining the effects of pressures from −10 to −175 mmHg Plast Reconstr Surg 125 502-509
[7]  
Fish SE(2009)Negative-pressure wound therapy II: negative-pressure wound therapy and increased perfusion. Just an illusion? Plast Reconstr Surg 123 601-612
[8]  
Day RD(1997)Treatment of infection by vacuum sealing Unfallchirurg 100 301-304
[9]  
Eneroth M(2005)Negative pressure wound therapy after partial diabetic foot amputation: a multicentre, randomised controlled trial Lancet 366 1704-1710
[10]  
van Houtum WH(2000)Vacuum assisted closure versus saline moistened gauze in healing of postoperative diabetic foot wounds Ostomy Wound Management 46 28-34