Implikationen der IFRS-Einführung auf die Informationsbasis und Prognosequalität von Finanzanalysten: State of the Art der empirischen Kapitalmarktforschung

被引:0
作者
Erkilet G. [1 ]
Kholmy K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Lehrstuhl für Accounting, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Universitätsstraße 150, Bochum
关键词
Empirical accounting research; Financial analysts; Forecast error; IFRS;
D O I
10.1007/s11301-015-0115-2
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In the last decades, more than 120 countries introduced IFRS as their official accounting standards on a voluntary or mandatory base. IFRS aim to increase transparency, comparability and quality of international financial reports in order to ensure investor protection and market efficiency. This global adoption process is accompanied and examined (ex-ante) by a broad number of research studies. One main research stream investigates the intended consequences of IFRS adoption on financial analysts as information intermediaries on capital markets. Financial analysts play a major role in empirical accounting research as they are sophisticated users of financial accounting information while their estimates and recommendations are publicly observable. Thus, this paper focuses on selected studies of this research path. First, it discusses analysts’ decision-making process and develops their conceptual role in IFRS accounting. Second, it reviews empirical literature on the economic consequences of voluntary and mandatory IFRS adoption on analysts’ information environment and forecast accuracy. The findings of empirical work provide some evidence that IFRS adoption has improved the information environment and forecast accuracy. However, due to some limitations, IFRS only seem to converge to their aims and there is still need for further research. The review concludes with avenues and suggestions for future research. © 2015, Wirtschaftsuniversität Wien, Austria.
引用
收藏
页码:33 / 73
页数:40
相关论文
共 83 条
[1]  
Abarbanell J.S., Lanen W.N., Verrechia R.E., Analysts‘ forecasts as proxies for investor beliefs in empirical research, J Acc Econ, 20, 1, pp. 31-60, (1995)
[2]  
Alvarez M., Wotschofsky S., Zwischenberichterstattung nach Börsen-recht/DRS, IAS und US-GAAP, (2003)
[3]  
Ashbaugh H., Pincus M., Domestic Accounting Standards, International Accounting Standards, and the Predictability of Earnings, J Acc Res, 39, 3, pp. 417-434, (2001)
[4]  
Ashenfelter O., Estimating the effect of training programs on earnings, Rev Econ Stat, 60, 1, pp. 47-57, (1978)
[5]  
Aubert F., Dumontier P., Analyzing brokers‘ expertise: did analysts fully anticipate the impact of IFRS adoption on earnings? The European evidence. Working Paper, Stand: 15.06, (2009)
[6]  
Bae K.H., Tan H., Welker M., International GAAP differences: the impact on foreign analysts, Acc Rev, 83, 3, pp. 593-628, (2008)
[7]  
Baetge J., Glaum M., Grothe A., Oberdorster T., Lohnt sich “gute Berichterstattung” am Kapitalmarkt? Die Qualität der Konzernanhänge und -lageberichte deutscher Unternehmen und Gewinnschätzungen von Analysten, ZfB, 80, 3, pp. 65-104, (2010)
[8]  
Ball R., International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS): pros and cons for investors, Acc Bus Res, 36, pp. 5-27, (2006)
[9]  
Ball R., Robin A., Wu J.S., Incentives versus standards: properties of accounting income in four East Asian countries, J Acc Econ, 36, 1-3, pp. 235-270, (2003)
[10]  
Barron O.E., Kim O., Lim S.C., Stevens D.E., Using analysts’ forecasts to measure properties of analysts’ information environment, Acc Rev, 73, 4, pp. 421-433, (1998)