Using Big Data to Prevent Crime: Legitimacy Matters

被引:0
作者
Youngsub Lee
Jongchan Park
机构
[1] Korean Institute of Criminology,
[2] Seoul Metropolitan Police Agency,undefined
来源
Asian Journal of Criminology | 2022年 / 17卷
关键词
Legitimacy; Police; Big data; Distributive fairness; Crime prevention;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This study uses a citizens’ awareness survey to gauge the impact of crime prevention initiatives based on big data. Crime prevention activities using large datasets inevitably involve reasonable concerns over: (a) the excessive concentration of information power to law enforcement agencies and (b) possible privacy violations by the state. This study explores the trends in this area through the application of the police legitimacy theory. It aims to gather insights into the use of big data to strengthen preventive responses to crimes by law enforcement agencies while also considering the citizens initiatives based on big data abuses. The survey conducted by the Korean Institute of Criminology in August 2015 was used for analysis through structural equation modeling (SEM). The results showed that, among important factors in police legitimacy theory, three primary items drew support for crime prevention activities based on big data: “distributive fairness,” “lawfulness,” and “effectiveness.” These overshadowed the “procedural fairness” variable, which has been emphasized in previous police legitimacy studies. This suggests that the law enforcement agencies should focus on the promulgation of the following: (1) big data as an aid to guaranteeing citizens’ rights in civil society, rather than the unilateral strengthening of national power, and (2) the effective and lawful use of big data as a method of stabilizing citizens’ personal security.
引用
收藏
页码:61 / 80
页数:19
相关论文
共 80 条
[1]  
Ariel B(2020)Using wearable technology to increase police legitimacy in Uruguay: The case of body-worn cameras Law & Social Inquiry 45 52-80
[2]  
Mitchell RJ(2009)Testing and extending the group engagement model: Linkages between social identity, procedural justice, economic outcomes, and extrarole behavior Journal of Applied Psychology 94 445-170
[3]  
Tankebe J(2012)Beyond procedural justice: A dialogic approach to legitimacy in criminal justice J. Crim. l. & Criminology 102 119-43
[4]  
Firpo ME(2014)Policing and social identity: Procedural justice, inclusion and cooperation between police and public Policing and Society 24 22-191
[5]  
Fraiman R(2015)Obeying the rules of the road: Procedural justice, social identity, and normative compliance Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice 31 171-268
[6]  
Hyatt JM(2014)What price fairness when security is at stake? Police legitimacy in South Africa Regulation & Governance 8 246-401
[7]  
Blader SL(2017)A leap of faith? Trust in the police among immigrants in England and Wales The British Journal of Criminology 57 381-1008
[8]  
Tyler TR(2017)Big data surveillance: The case of policing American Sociological Review 82 977-464
[9]  
Bottoms A(2010)The second modern condition? Compressed modernity as internalized reflexive cosmopolitization The British Journal of Sociology 61 444-201
[10]  
Tankebe J(2008)Legitimacy, trust, social capital, and policing styles: A theoretical statement Police Quarterly 11 182-37