Spatial constraints on visual-tactile cross-modal distractor congruency effects

被引:0
作者
Charles Spence
Francesco Pavani
Jon Driver
机构
[1] Università di Trento,Department of Experimental Psychology
[2] University College London,undefined
[3] University of Oxford,undefined
来源
Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience | 2004年 / 4卷
关键词
Stimulus Onset Asynchrony; Congruency Effect; Distractor Stimulus; Peripersonal Space; Visual Distractor;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Across three experiments, participants made speeded elevation discrimination responses to vibrotactile targets presented to the thumb (held in a lower position) or the index finger (upper position) of either hand, while simultaneously trying to ignore visual distractors presented independently from either the same or a different elevation. Performance on the vibrotactile elevation discrimination task was slower and less accurate when the visual distractor was incongruent with the elevation of the vibrotactile target (e.g., a lower light during the presentation of an upper vibrotactile target to the index finger) than when they were congruent, showing that people cannot completely ignore vision when selectively attending to vibrotactile information. We investigated the attentional, temporal, and spatial modulation of these cross-modal congruency effects by manipulating the direction of endogenous tactile spatial attention, the stimulus onset asynchrony between target and distractor, and the spatial separation between the vibrotactile target, any visual distractors, and the participant’s two hands within and across hemifields. Our results provide new insights into the spatiotemporal modulation of crossmodal congruency effects and highlight the utility of this paradigm for investigating the contributions of visual, tactile, and proprioceptive inputs to the multisensory representation of peripersonal space.
引用
收藏
页码:148 / 169
页数:21
相关论文
共 155 条
[1]  
Austen E. L.(2001)Virtual body effect: Factors influencing visual-tactile integration Abstracts of the Psychonomic Society 6 2-2
[2]  
Soto-Faraco S.(1998)The missing link: The role of interhemispheric interaction in attentional processing Brain & Cognition 36 128-157
[3]  
Pinel J. P. J.(1999)What kind of attention modulates the Stroop effect? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 6 99-104
[4]  
Kingstone A. F.(1992)Effects of expectancy and attention in vibrotactile choice reaction time tasks Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 44A 509-528
[5]  
Banich M. T.(2000)Preserved cross-modal attentional links in the absence of conscious vision: Evidence from patients with primary visual cortex lesions [Abstract] Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 12 38-553
[6]  
Besner D.(1985)A psychophysiological investigation of the continuous flow model of human information processing Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance 11 529-1477
[7]  
Stolz J. A.(2000)Direct evidence from parietal extinction of enhancement of visual attention near a visible hand Current Biology 10 1475-730
[8]  
Bradshaw J. L.(1997)Seeing where your hands are Nature 388 730-1331
[9]  
Howard M. J.(1998)Crossmodal links in spatial attention Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London: Series B 353 1319-231
[10]  
Pierson J. M.(1971)The duration of word meaning responses: Stroop interference for different preexposures of the word Psychonomic Science 25 229-705