Marker-Controlled Watershed for Lesion Segmentation in Mammograms

被引:0
作者
Shengzhou Xu
Hong Liu
Enmin Song
机构
[1] Huazhong University of Science and Technology,School of Computer Science and Technology
[2] Key laboratory of Education Ministry for Image Processing and Intelligent Control,undefined
来源
Journal of Digital Imaging | 2011年 / 24卷
关键词
Watershed; Marker; Lesion; Mammogram; Morphological gradient;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Lesion segmentation, which is a critical step in computer-aided diagnosis system, is a challenging task as lesion boundaries are usually obscured, irregular, and low contrast. In this paper, an accurate and robust algorithm for the automatic segmentation of breast lesions in mammograms is proposed. The traditional watershed transformation is applied to the smoothed (by the morphological reconstruction) morphological gradient image to obtain the lesion boundary in the belt between the internal and external markers. To automatically determine the internal and external markers, the rough region of the lesion is identified by a template matching and a thresholding method. Then, the internal marker is determined by performing a distance transform and the external marker by morphological dilation. The proposed algorithm is quantitatively compared to the dynamic programming boundary tracing method and the plane fitting and dynamic programming method on a set of 363 lesions (size range, 5–42 mm in diameter; mean, 15 mm), using the area overlap metric (AOM), Hausdorff distance (HD), and average minimum Euclidean distance (AMED). The mean ± SD of the values of AOM, HD, and AMED for our method were respectively 0.72 ± 0.13, 5.69 ± 2.85 mm, and 1.76 ± 1.04 mm, which is a better performance than two other proposed segmentation methods. The results also confirm the potential of the proposed algorithm to allow reliable segmentation and quantification of breast lesion in mammograms.
引用
收藏
页码:754 / 763
页数:9
相关论文
共 63 条
  • [1] Nishikawa RM(2007)Current status and future directions of computer-aided diagnosis in mammography Comput Med Imaging Graph 31 224-235
  • [2] Reddy M(2006)Screening for breast cancer Women’s Health Medicine 3 22-27
  • [3] Given-Wilson R(2010)A comparison of two methods for the segmentation of masses in the digital mammograms Comput Med Imaging Graph 34 185-191
  • [4] Dubey RB(2006)Screening mammograms: Interpretation with computer-aided detection—prospective evaluation Radiology 239 375-383
  • [5] Hanmandlu M(2009)Computer-aided mass detection in mammography: False positive reduction via gray-scale invariant ranklet texture features Medical physics 36 311-316
  • [6] Gupta SK(2007)A concentric morphology model for the detection of masses in mammography IEEE Trans Med Imaging 26 880-889
  • [7] Morton MJ(2007)A dual-stage method for lesion segmentation on digital mammograms Med Phys 34 4180-4193
  • [8] Whaley DH(2004)A new 2D segmentation method based on dynamic programming applied to computer aided detection in mammography Med Phys 31 958-971
  • [9] Brandt KR(2007)Improved dynamic-programming-based algorithms for segmentation of masses in mammograms Med Phys 34 4256-4269
  • [10] Amrami KK(2009)Breast mass segmentation in mammography using plane fitting and dynamic programming Acad Radiol 16 826-835