Soliciting judgments of forgetting reactively enhances memory as well as making judgments of learning: Empirical and meta-analytic tests

被引：0
作者：
Baike Li
Wenbo Zhao
Jun Zheng
Xiao Hu
Ningxin Su
Tian Fan
Yue Yin
Meng Liu
Chunliang Yang
Liang Luo
机构：
[1] Beijing Normal University,Institute of Developmental Psychology, Faculty of Psychology
[2] Beijing Normal University,Collaborative Innovation Center of Assessment for Basic Education Quality
[3] South China Normal University,School of Psychology
[4] Beijing Normal University,Beijing Key Laboratory of Applied Experimental Psychology, National Demonstration Center for Experimental Psychology Education
来源：
Memory & Cognition | 2022年 / 50卷
关键词：
Judgments of forgetting; Judgments of learning; Reactivity effect; Memory; Meta-analysis;
D O I：
暂无
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
Recent studies found that making judgments of learning (JOLs) can reactively facilitate memory, a phenomenon termed the reactivity effect of JOLs. The current study was designed to explore (1) whether making judgments of forgetting (JOFs) can also enhance memory and (2) whether there is any difference between the reactivity effects of JOFs and JOLs. Experiment 1 found that soliciting JOFs significantly enhanced retention of single words. Experiments 2 and 3 observed minimal difference in reactivity effects between JOFs and JOLs on learning of single words and word pairs. Finally, a meta-analysis was conducted to integrate results across studies to explore whether retention of items studied with JOLs differed from that of items studied with JOFs. The meta-analytic results showed minimal difference. Overall, the documented findings imply that (1) making JOFs reactively enhances memory, and (2) there is little difference in reactivity effects between JOFs and JOLs. These findings support the positive-reactivity theory to account for the reactivity effect.
引用
收藏
页码：1061 / 1077
页数：16
相关论文
共 88 条
[1]  
Ariel R(2021)Do judgments of learning directly enhance learning of educational materials? Educational Psychology Review 33 693-712
[2]  
Karpicke JD(1970)Signal detection theory and human memory Psychological Bulletin 74 81-99
[3]  
Witherby AE(2015)Null hypothesis significance testing does not show equivalence Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy 15 418-421
[4]  
Tauber SK(2019)How many participants do we have to include in properly powered experiments? A tutorial of power analysis with reference tables Journal of Cognition 2 16-1146
[5]  
Banks WP(2010)SUBTLEX-CH: Chinese word and character frequencies based on film subtitles PLoS ONE 5 1111-326
[6]  
Barchard KA(2018)Retrieval potentiates new learning: A theoretical and meta-analytic review Psychological Bulletin 144 309-750
[7]  
Brysbaert M(2018)Reactivity to confidence ratings in older individuals performing the latin square task Metacognition and Learning 13 2755-565
[8]  
Cai Q(2019)Reactivity to measures of metacognition Frontiers in Psychology 10 741-P186
[9]  
Brysbaert M(2018)A meta-analysis and systematic review of reactivity to judgements of learning Memory 26 558-634
[10]  
Chan JC(2018)Do metacognitive judgments alter memory performance beyond the benefits of retrieval practice? A comment on and replication attempt of Dougherty, Scheck, Nelson, and Narens (2005) Memory & Cognition 46 P178-191
123456789