Teachers’ noticing to promote students’ mathematical dialogue in group work

被引:0
作者
Marie Sjöblom
Paola Valero
Clas Olander
机构
[1] Malmö University,
[2] Stockholm University,undefined
来源
Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education | 2023年 / 26卷
关键词
Group work; Inquiry co-operation model; Noticing; Promoting mathematical dialogue; Student interaction; Questions in mathematics;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
How can teachers refine their strategies for purposefully engaging students in mathematical discussions when students are working in groups and the teacher enters an ongoing group conversation? In three educational design research cycles, four teachers collaborated with a researcher for one year to analyse, design and evaluate strategies for engaging students in small-group mathematical discussions. The idea of noticing (Mason in Researching your own practice: the discipline of noticing, RoutledgeFalmer, London, 2002; Sherin et al. in Mathematics teacher noticing: seeing through teachers’ eyes, Taylor & Francis, New York, 2011) was used to organize the findings—by paying attention to aspects in the mathematical discussions and interpreting the interactions, teachers could together refine their own actions/responses to better support students’ work. The Inquiry Co-operation Model of Alrø and Skovsmose (Dialogue and learning in mathematics education: intention, reflection, critique, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 2004) was used as a theoretical base for understanding qualities in mathematical discussions. Ehrenfeld and Horn’s (Educ Stud Math 103(7):251–272, 2020) model of initiation-entry-focus-exit and participation was for interpreting and organizing the findings on teachers’ actions. The results show that teachers became more aware of the importance of explicit instructions and their own role as facilitators of mathematical questions to students, by directing specific mathematical questions to all students within the groups. In this article, by going back and forth between what happened in the teachers’ professional development group and in the classrooms, it was possible to simultaneously follow the teachers’ development processes and what changed in students’ mathematical discussions.
引用
收藏
页码:509 / 531
页数:22
相关论文
共 48 条
[11]  
Ehrenfeld N(2013)Three key concepts of the theory of objectification: Knowledge, knowing, and learning Journal of Research in Mathematics Education 2 7-134
[12]  
Horn I(2021)Mathematics teacher learning to notice: A systematic review of studies of video-based programs ZDM Mathematics Education 53 119-432
[13]  
Esmonde I(2017)Uses of video in understanding and improving mathematical thinking and teaching Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education 20 415-76
[14]  
Langer-Osuna JM(2001)Cognition as communication: Rethinking learning-by-talking through multi-faceted analysis of students’ mathematical interactions Mind, Culture and Activity 8 42-495
[15]  
Fuentes SQ(2017)Mathematics teachers’ self-captured video and opportunities for learning Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education 20 477-79
[16]  
Hintz A(2015)Promoting student-to-student interaction in mathematics: A study in a multilingual upper secondary classroom Malmö Studies in Educational Sciences: Licentiate Dissertation Series 2015 40-340
[17]  
Tyson K(2018)Developing mathematical reasoning by using questions in a multilingual mathematics classroom Nordic Studies in Mathematics Education 23 61-551
[18]  
Lefstein A(2008)Orchestrating productive mathematical discussions: Five practices for helping teachers move beyond show and tell Mathematical Thinking and Learning 10 313-undefined
[19]  
Louie N(2008)The teacher’s role in classroom discourse: A review of recent research into mathematics classrooms Review of Educational Research 78 516-undefined
[20]  
Segal A(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined