Good Clinical Practice Training: Identifying Key Elements and Strategies for Increasing Training Efficiency

被引:0
作者
Jaime Arango
Tina Chuck
Susan S. Ellenberg
Bridget Foltz
Colleen Gorman
Heidi Hinrichs
Susan McHale
Kunal Merchant
Jonathan Seltzer
Stephanie Shapley
Gretchen Wild
机构
[1] University of Miami,Collaborative Institutional Training Initiative
[2] Northwell Health,Food and Drug Administration
[3] University of Pennsylvania,Food and Drug Administration
[4] Office of Good Clinical Practice,undefined
[5] Pfizer,undefined
[6] St Jude Medical,undefined
[7] AstraZeneca,undefined
[8] Clinical Trials Transformation Initiative,undefined
[9] ACI Clinical,undefined
[10] Center for Drug Evaluation and Research,undefined
来源
Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science | 2016年 / 50卷
关键词
Good Clinical Practice; GCP; clinical trials; clinical research training;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Good Clinical Practice (GCP) is an international standard for the design, conduct, performance, monitoring, auditing, recording, analyses, and reporting of clinical trials. The goal of GCP is to ensure the protection of the rights, integrity, and confidentiality of clinical trial participants and to ensure the credibility and accuracy of data and reported results. In the United States, trial sponsors generally require investigators to complete GCP training prior to participating in each clinical trial to foster GCP and as a method to meet regulatory expectations (ie, sponsor’s responsibility to select qualified investigators per 21 CFR 312.50 and 312.53(a) for drugs and biologics and 21 CFR 812.40 and 812.43(a) for medical devices). This training requirement is often extended to investigative site staff, as deemed relevant by the sponsor, institution, or investigator. Those who participate in multiple clinical trials are often required by sponsors to complete repeated GCP training, which is unnecessarily burdensome. The Clinical Trials Transformation Initiative convened a multidisciplinary project team involving partners from academia, industry, other researchers and research staff, and government to develop recommendations for streamlining current GCP training practices. Recommendations drafted by the project team, including the minimum key training elements, frequency, format, and evidence of training completion, were presented to a broad group of experts to foster discussion of the current issues and to seek consensus on proposed solutions.
引用
收藏
页码:480 / 486
页数:6
相关论文
共 98 条
[1]  
Anderson MS(2007)What do mentoring and training in the responsible conduct of research have to do with scientists’ misbehavior? Findings from a National Survey of NIH-funded scientists Acad Med 82 853-860
[2]  
Horn AS(2007)Educational approaches to the responsible conduct of clinical research: an exploratory study Acad Med 82 32-39
[3]  
Risbey KR(2010)Instruction in the responsible conduct of research: an inventory of programs and materials within CTSAs Clin Transl Sci 3 109-111
[4]  
Ronning EA(2007)Perspectives of clinical research coordinators on disclosing financial conflicts of interest to potential research participants Clin Trials 4 272-278
[5]  
De Vries R(2007)New graduate students’ baseline knowledge of the responsible conduct of research Acad Med 82 838-845
[6]  
Martinson BC(2007)Reported goals for responsible conduct of research courses Acad Med 82 846-852
[7]  
DeBruin DA(2007)An education initiative to increase staff knowledge of Institutional Review Board guidelines in the USA Nurs Health Sci 9 103-106
[8]  
Scholder SL(2006)Research misconduct among clinical trial staff Sci Eng Ethics 12 481-489
[9]  
Kahn J(2012)Do U.S. research institutions meet or exceed federal mandates for instruction in responsible conduct of research? A national survey Acad Med 87 1237-1242
[10]  
DuBois JM(2007)The history, purpose, and future of instruction in the responsible conduct of research Acad Med 82 829-834