Modelling of infiltration of sandy soil using gaussian process regression

被引:65
作者
Sihag P. [1 ]
Tiwari N.K. [1 ]
Ranjan S. [1 ]
机构
[1] National Institute of Technology, Kurukshetra
关键词
Cumulative infiltration; Gaussian process regression; Multi-linear regression; Support vector regression;
D O I
10.1007/s40808-017-0357-1
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The aim of this paper to assesses the potential of machine learning approaches, i.e. multi-linear regression (MLR), support vector regression (SVR), Gaussian process (GP) regression of cumulative infiltration and compares their performances with three traditional models [Kostiakov model, US-Soil Conservation Service (SCS) model and Philip’s model]. Data set as many as 413 were obtained by conducting experiments in laboratory of NIT Kurukshetra. It is observed from the experiments that moisture content influences the cumulative infiltration of soil. Out of 413 data set 289 arbitrary selected were used for training the models, whereas remaining 124 were used for testing. Input data set consist of time, sand, rice husk ash, fly ash, suction head, bulk density and moisture content where as cumulative infiltration was considered as output. Two kernel function i.e. Pearson VII and radial based kernel function were used with both SVR and GP regression. The results after comparison suggests that the GP regression based approach works better than SVR, MLR, Kostiakov model, SCS model and Philip’s model approaches and it could be successfully used in prediction of cumulative infiltration data. © 2017, Springer International Publishing AG.
引用
收藏
页码:1091 / 1100
页数:9
相关论文
共 34 条
[21]  
Rasmussen C.E., Williams C.K.I., Gaussian processes for machine learning, (2006)
[22]  
Richards L.A., Capillary conduction of liquids through porous mediums, J Appl Phys, 1, 5, pp. 318-333, (1931)
[23]  
Schuh W.M., Bauder J.W., Effect of soil properties on hydraulic conductivity–moisture relationships, Soil Sci Soc Am J, 50, 4, pp. 848-855, (1986)
[24]  
Sihag P., Tiwari N.K., Ranjan S., Estimation and inter-comparison of infiltration models, Water Sci, 31, 1, pp. 34-43, (2017)
[25]  
Singh V.P., Yu F.X., Derivation of infiltration equation using systems approach, J Irrig Drain Eng, (1990)
[26]  
Singh K.K., Pal M., Ojha C.S.P., Singh V.P., Estimation of removal efficiency for settling basins using neural networks and support vector machines, J Hydrol Eng, 13, 3, pp. 146-155, (2008)
[27]  
Singh B.K., Tiwari N.K., Singh K.K., Support vector regression based modelling of trapping efficiency of silt ejector, J Indian Water Resour Soc, 36, 1, (2016)
[28]  
Singh B., Sihag P., Singh K., Modelling of impact of water quality on infiltration rate of soil by random forest regression, Model Earth Syst Environ, (2017)
[29]  
Smola A.J., Regression Estimation with Support Vector Learning Machines, (1996)
[30]  
Ustun B., Melssen W.J., Buydens L.M.C., Facilitating the application of support vector regression by using a universal Pearson VII function based kernel, Chemometr Intell Lab Syst, 81, pp. 29-40, (2006)