Left main stem stenosis: percutaneous coronary intervention vs. surgical coronary revascularization

被引:0
|
作者
Arsalan M. [1 ]
Walther T. [1 ]
机构
[1] Abteilung für Herzchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, Frankfurt am Main
关键词
Coronary artery disease; Guidelines; Heart team; Randomized controlled trials; Standard of care;
D O I
10.1007/s00398-018-0270-6
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Surgical coronary revascularization was considered standard of care for left main stem stenosis for decades; however, in recent years, this type of coronary artery disease is treated increasingly more by percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). It remains controversial which procedure should be used for an individual patient and this topic was the subject of numerous studies with partly contradictory results. For suitable patients, some studies showed a non-inferiority of PCI over coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), while others demonstrated a significant advantage for surgery. This CME article provides a comprehensive overview of the current national and international guidelines as well as major studies on left main stem stenosis and points out the potential advantages and disadvantages of each treatment modality. Furthermore, it shows how the establishment of an interdisciplinary coronary heart team can result in optimal patient-centered treatment. © 2018, Springer Medizin Verlag GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature.
引用
收藏
页码:471 / 481
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Is percutaneous coronary intervention as effective as bypass surgery in left main stem coronary artery stenosis?
    Stiermaier, T.
    Schuler, G.
    Boudriot, E.
    Desch, S.
    Thiele, H.
    HERZ, 2013, 38 (02) : 147 - 152
  • [2] Hybrid Coronary Revascularization versus Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for True Left Main Bifurcation Lesions
    Yang, Cheng
    Sui, Yong-Gang
    Wu, Yong-Jian
    CIRCULATION, 2023, 148
  • [3] Impact of Ticagrelor vs. Clopidogrel in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome Undergoing Left Main Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
    Qiu, Miaohan
    Zhi, Xuehan
    Liu, Haiwei
    Liang, Zhenyang
    Wang, Bin
    Xu, Kai
    Guan, Shaoyi
    Wang, Geng
    Wang, Xiaozeng
    Ma, Yingyan
    Jing, Quanmin
    CARDIOLOGY DISCOVERY, 2025, 5 (01): : 39 - 46
  • [4] Outcomes of Left Main Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
    Rahman, Muhammad Nasir
    Hussain, Bilal
    Artani, Azmina
    JCPSP-JOURNAL OF THE COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS AND SURGEONS PAKISTAN, 2019, 29 (06): : 498 - 501
  • [5] Left main stem disease: percutaneous coronary intervention vs. coronary artery bypass grafting-what about medical management? A case report
    Kaczmarska-Dyrda, Edyta
    Rudzinski, Piotr Nikodem
    Debski, Mariusz
    Dzielinska, Zofia
    Demkow, Marcin
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL-CASE REPORTS, 2025, 9 (03)
  • [6] Outcome and selection of revascularization strategy in left main coronary artery stenosis
    Gripenberg, Thomas
    Jokhaji, Fadi
    Ostlund-Papadogeorgos, Nikolaos
    Ekenback, Christina
    Linder, Rikard
    Samad, Bassem
    Persson, Jonas
    SCANDINAVIAN CARDIOVASCULAR JOURNAL, 2018, 52 (02) : 100 - 107
  • [7] Outcomes of Primary Percutaneous Intervention of the Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Stenosis in Myocardial Infarction
    Darrat, Yousef Hadi
    Guirgis, Hany
    El-Hamdani, Mehiar O.
    Cansino, Silvestre
    Gress, Todd W.
    Studeny, Mark
    SOUTHERN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2012, 105 (11) : 585 - 590
  • [8] Randomized Comparison of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Sirolimus-Eluting Stents Versus Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Unprotected Left Main Stem Stenosis
    Boudriot, Enno
    Thiele, Holger
    Walther, Thomas
    Liebetrau, Christoph
    Boeckstegers, Peter
    Pohl, Tilmann
    Reichart, Bruno
    Mudra, Harald
    Beier, Florian
    Gansera, Brigitte
    Neumann, Franz-Josef
    Gick, Michael
    Zietak, Thomas
    Desch, Steffen
    Schuler, Gerhard
    Mohr, Friedrich-Wilhelm
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2011, 57 (05) : 538 - 545
  • [9] Left main coronary artery percutaneous revascularization: alea jacta est
    Lozano Ruiz-Poveda, Fernando
    Abellan-Huerta, Jose
    Sanchez-Perez, Ignacio
    REC-INTERVENTIONAL CARDIOLOGY, 2021, 3 (01): : 45 - 54
  • [10] Clinical outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention in patients turned down for surgical revascularization
    Sukul, Devraj
    Seth, Milan
    Dixon, Simon R.
    Zainea, Mark
    Slocum, Nicklaus K.
    Pielsticker, Elizabeth J.
    Gurm, Hitinder S.
    CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2017, 90 (01) : 94 - 101