共 115 条
[1]
Osterman MJ(2014)Recent declines in induction of labor by gestational age NCHS Data Brief 155 1-8
[2]
Martin JA(2014)Foley catheter compared with the controlled-release dinoprostone insert: a randomized controlled trial Obstet Gynecol 123 1280-1287
[3]
Edwards RK(2015)Prospective multi-centre randomised trial comparing induction of labour with a double-balloon catheter versus dinoprostone J Obstet Gynaecol 35 797-802
[4]
Szychowski JM(2016)Double-balloon catheter and sequential vaginal prostaglandin E2 versus vaginal prostaglandin E2 alone for induction of labor after previous cesarean section Arch Gynecol Obstet 293 757-765
[5]
Berger JL(2013)Non-hormonal methods for induction of labour Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 25 441-447
[6]
Petersen M(2011)Foley catheter versus vaginal prostaglandin E2 gel for induction of labour at term (PROBAAT trial): an open-label, randomised controlled trial Lancet 378 2095-2103
[7]
Ingersoll M(2004)A randomized trial comparing a 30-ml and an 80-ml Foley catheter balloon for preinduction cervical ripening Am J Obstet Gynecol 191 1632-1636
[8]
Bodea-Braescu AV(2011)Single-balloon compared with double-balloon catheters for induction of labor: a randomized controlled trial Obstet Gynecol 118 79-86
[9]
Lin MG(2015)Sequential use of double-balloon catheter and oral misoprostol versus oral misoprostol alone for induction of labour at term (CRB plus trial): a multicentre, open-label randomised controlled trial BJOG 122 129-136
[10]
Lokkegaard E(2016)A systematic review and network meta-analysis comparing the use of Foley catheters, misoprostol, and dinoprostone for cervical ripening in the induction of labour BJOG 123 346-354