The need for standardization of nuclear cardiology reporting and data system (NCAD-RADS): Learning from coronary artery disease (CAD), breast imaging (BI), liver imaging (LI), and prostate imaging (PI) RADS

被引:0
作者
Majid Assadi
Erik Velez
Mohammad Hosein Najafi
Ali Gholamrezanezhad
机构
[1] The Persian Gulf Nuclear Medicine Research Center,Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Keck School of Medicine
[2] Bushehr University of Medical Sciences,Department of Cardiology, Tehran Medical Unit
[3] University of Southern California (USC),undefined
[4] Azad University,undefined
来源
Journal of Nuclear Cardiology | 2019年 / 26卷
关键词
Nuclear cardiology; SPECT; scintigraphy; myocardial perfusion; imaging reporting and data systems; standardization; decision making; report; dictation; diagnosis; interpretation;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Newer structured reporting manners, the reporting and data system (RADS), have made vast steps in improving standardized and structured reporting, allowing better communication between radiologists and referring providers. This has been implemented in several fields: breast (BI-RADS), lung (Lung-RADS), liver (LI-RADS), thyroid (TI-RADS), prostate (PI-RADS), and in cardiovascular radiology (CAD-RADS). The field of nuclear cardiology began its efforts of standardization years ago; however, a widespread standardized reporting structure has not yet been adopted. Such an approach in nuclear cardiology, the nuclear cardiology reporting and data system (NCAD-RADS), will assist radiologists and treating clinicians in conveying and understanding reports and determining the appropriate next steps in management. By linking explicit findings to defined recommendations, patients will receive more consistent and appropriate care.
引用
收藏
页码:660 / 665
页数:5
相关论文
共 125 条
[31]  
Dhatt HS(2016)CAD-RADS: A giant first step toward a common lexicon? JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 9 1125-2151
[32]  
Heilbrun ME(2018)The Coronary Artery Disease-Reporting and Data System (CAD-RADS): Prognostic and clinical implications associated with standardized coronary computed tomography angiography reporting JACC Cardiovascular imaging 11 78-290
[33]  
Lee R(2006)Achieving quality in cardiovascular imaging: Proceedings from the American College of Cardiology-Duke University Medical Center Think Tank on Quality in Cardiovascular Imaging J Am Coll Cardiol 48 2141-406
[34]  
Cohen MD(2002)Recommendations for a standardized report for adult transthoracic echocardiography: A report from the American Society of Echocardiography’s Nomenclature and Standards Committee and Task Force for a Standardized Echocardiography Report J Am Soc Echocardiogr 15 275-undefined
[35]  
Jennings GS(2013)Standardized image interpretation and post processing in cardiovascular magnetic resonance: Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (SCMR) board of trustees task force on standardized post processing J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 15 35-undefined
[36]  
Bosmans JM(2014)ACCF/AHA/ASE/ASNC/HFSA/HRS/SCAI/SCCT/SCMR/STS 2013 multimodality appropriate use criteria for the detection and risk assessment of stable ischemic heart disease: A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, American Heart Association, American Society of Echocardiography, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, Heart Failure Society of America, Heart Rhythm Society, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society
[37]  
Weyler JJ(2018)Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography (SPECT) Myocardial Perfusion Imaging Guidelines: Instrumentation, acquisition, processing, and interpretation J Nucl Cardiol undefined undefined-undefined
[38]  
Parizel PM(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined
[39]  
Khorasani R(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined
[40]  
Bates DW(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined