How and Why Do Social and Sustainable Initiatives Scale? A Systematic Review of the Literature on Social Entrepreneurship and Grassroots Innovation

被引:0
作者
Marion van Lunenburg
Karin Geuijen
Albert Meijer
机构
[1] Utrecht School of Governance,
来源
VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations | 2020年 / 31卷
关键词
Scaling; Social and sustainable initiatives; Social impact; Social entrepreneurship; Grassroots innovation;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Social and sustainable initiatives generally start small and need to scale to create substantial impact. Our systematic review of 133 articles develops a better understanding of this scaling process. From the literature, we conceptualize impact as the result of two different pathways: ‘scaling out’ (extending geographical space or volume) and ‘scaling up’ (influence on public discourses, political agendas and legislation). The review identified strategy, actor characteristics and institutional environment as key factors for scaling. The literature indicates that for strategy a focus on open structures generates speed and higher impact, but we also found critical views on this. The literature shows that the actor characteristics such as the ambition to scale, equal focus on the economic and the social logic, entrepreneurial skills and leadership are positively related to the level of impact. The institutional environment influences actor characteristics and strategy choices and also has a direct effect on the level of social and sustainable impact.
引用
收藏
页码:1013 / 1024
页数:11
相关论文
共 227 条
  • [1] Andre K(2016)From caring entrepreneur to caring enterprise: Addressing the ethical challenges of scaling up social enterprises Journal of Business Ethics 133 659-675
  • [2] Pache AC(2012)Application of a CBPR framework to inform a multi-level tobacco cessation intervention in public housing neighborhoods American Journal of Community Psychology 50 129-140
  • [3] Andrews JO(2016)An institutional perspective on the social outcome of entrepreneurship: Commercial microfinance and inclusive markets Journal of International Business Studies 47 951-967
  • [4] Tingen MS(2015)Understanding social change through catalytic innovation: Empirical findings in Mexican social entrepreneurship Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences-Revue Canadienne Des Sciences De L Administration 32 238-251
  • [5] Jarriel SC(2013)The Ghana essential health interventions program: A plausibility trial of the impact of health systems strengthening on maternal and child survival Bmc Health Services Research 13 S3-605
  • [6] Caleb M(2010)Some things old, some things new: The spatial representations and politics of change of the peak oil relocalisation movement Geoforum 41 595-36
  • [7] Simmons A(2017)Community energy and social entrepreneurship: Addressing purpose, organisation and embeddedness of renewable energy projects Journal of Cleaner Production 147 25-522
  • [8] Brunson J(2014)Franchising as a strategy for combining small and large group advantages (logics) in social entrepreneurship: A Hayekian perspective Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 43 502-1126
  • [9] Mueller M(2007)Pharmaceuticalization: AIDS treatment and global health politics Anthropological Quarterly 80 1083-658
  • [10] Ahluwalia JS(2010)Navigating the back loop: Fostering social innovation and transformation in ecosystem management Ecology and Society 15 9-308